Update

Muft Shiksha™ एक 100% Free Education Portal है 🇮🇳, जिसका उद्देश्य Class 9–12 के हर विद्यार्थी तक High-Quality Education को पूरी तरह मुफ्त पहुँचाना है। 🇮🇳 हम मानते हैं कि अच्छी शिक्षा किसी student की आर्थिक स्थिति पर निर्भर नहीं होनी चाहिए। 🇮🇳 हर विद्यार्थी को वही Quality Study Material, MCQs, Quizzes, Exam Preparation, Concept-Based Learning और Bilingual Support मिलना चाहिए, जो आमतौर पर महंगी Coaching या Premium Platforms में मिलता है। Muft Shiksha™ 🇮🇳 इसी सोच के साथ बनाया गया है

Subjects

Social Science

Differing Strands within the Movement

Class 10 Social Science explores how India’s national movement brought together groups with different experiences, demands and expectations. Students examine the participation of peasants, tribal communities, plantation workers, business groups, workers, women, Dalits and Muslims, and see why their involvement did not always follow the same path. The topic highlights both the strength of collective action and the social tensions and limits within nationalism in India.

Hard · Level 2 · 25 questions

TOPIC PRACTICE

Quiz this set

Up to 25 questions from this page. Select your focus, then start.

25 questions

Choose questions
View options
  1. It restricted their freedom to move and leave work
  2. It gave them rights over forests
  3. It ended peasants’ rent
  4. It weakened talukdars
View options
  1. They understood non-cooperation as hope of freedom from their lack of liberty
  2. They saw non-cooperation as a chance to become landlords
  3. They saw non-cooperation as an order to close forests
  4. They saw non-cooperation as a means to strengthen colonial rule
View options
  1. For peasants it meant relief from land-related injustice while for workers it meant freedom of movement
  2. For both peasants and workers it only meant forest rights
  3. For peasants it meant becoming plantation owners and for workers becoming talukdars
  4. Both saw swaraj as support for colonial rule
View options
  1. A common slogan was filled with different hopes of different groups
  2. All groups had the same demand
  3. Local issues had no importance
  4. The movement remained limited to cities
View options
  1. It was a uniform movement of only one class
  2. It included participation of different social groups
  3. Local issues played a role in it
  4. Its message reached rural areas
View options
  1. They turned local rural grievances into organised national questions
  2. They made all peasants plantation workers
  3. They ended tribal forest rights
  4. They increased taxes for colonial rule
View options
  1. A medium to connect with rural consciousness and organisation
  2. An order of colonial rule
  3. A policy of the forest department
  4. A plan to recruit plantation workers
View options
  1. It showed the presence of anti-colonial resistance even in a distant tribal region
  2. It gave rural support to colonial rule
  3. It sent peasants to plantations
  4. It increased landlord power
View options
  1. Because he gave leadership hope and direction of resistance to tribal discontent
  2. Because he reduced plantation workers’ wages
  3. Because he supported talukdars
  4. Because he weakened forest rights
View options
  1. Because in the Gudem area the struggle also appeared more militant and armed
  2. Because the tribal movement had no relation with swaraj
  3. Because it had no local issue
  4. Because it was a movement of plantation workers
View options
  1. Both connected local injustice with resistance to colonial rule
  2. Both strengthened colonial rule
  3. Both remained only in cities
  4. Both were led by plantation owners
View options
  1. It became difficult to combine different demands into a disciplined wider struggle
  2. Mass participation completely ended
  3. Local issues disappeared automatically
  4. The movement became support for colonial rule
View options
  1. Dependence was created through contract and movement control over workers
  2. Workers were given full political rights
  3. Workers received rights over all forests
  4. Workers received rent from landlords
View options
  1. Peasants linked it with relief from rent and workers with return home
  2. All groups saw it only as writing a constitution
  3. Tribals saw it as buying foreign cloth
  4. Talukdars saw it as ending forced labour
View options
  1. In both local discontent linked with the national movement but issues and methods differed
  2. Both ran for exactly the same causes
  3. Both were movements only of plantation workers
  4. Both supported colonial rule
View options
  1. Nationalism became a broad public experience linked with common people’s suffering and hopes
  2. Nationalism became limited only to royal palaces
  3. Nationalism remained only a policy of colonial officials
  4. Nationalism became completely separate from local issues
View options
  1. Because together they show the full picture of economic burden and labour exploitation
  2. Because both were types of forest rights
  3. Because both were linked with plantation workers’ leave
  4. Because both were sea trade rules
View options
  1. Because it had deeper causes like forest rights livelihood labour and state control
  2. Because it had no social cause
  3. Because it was only a question of plantation labour
  4. Because it was only boycott of foreign cloth
View options
  1. Swaraj was not only change of rule but also desire for freedom in daily life
  2. Swaraj was only the property of landlords
  3. Swaraj had no relation with workers
  4. Swaraj only meant restriction on forests
View options
  1. The movement must connect with real problems of people
  2. The movement must stay away from people
  3. The movement is made only by officials
  4. Local experiences have no importance in a movement
View options
  1. Explain that different groups linked swaraj with their different problems
  2. Explain that peasants did not participate
  3. Explain that tribals had no relation with forests
  4. Explain that workers were completely free
View options
  1. Nai-Dhobi bandh
  2. Inland Emigration Act
  3. Restriction on forest produce
  4. Return home of plantation workers
View options
  1. Because they increased government control over forests and weakened traditional rights
  2. Because they gave complete freedom to tribals
  3. Because they sent plantation workers home
  4. Because they reduced peasants’ rent
View options
  1. Their hope of freedom clashed with the harsh colonial system
  2. They reached home completely freely
  3. They received rights over forests
  4. Their movement was in favour of landlords
View options
  1. Leadership could put more stress on restraining or controlling the movement
  2. Leadership could increase forest laws instead of ending them
  3. Leadership could make plantation workers kings
  4. Leadership could make colonial rule permanent

Add Muft Shiksha to your Home Screen

In Safari, tap Share, then Add to Home Screen.