Update

Muft Shiksha™ एक 100% Free Education Portal है 🇮🇳, जिसका उद्देश्य Class 9–12 के हर विद्यार्थी तक High-Quality Education को पूरी तरह मुफ्त पहुँचाना है। 🇮🇳 हम मानते हैं कि अच्छी शिक्षा किसी student की आर्थिक स्थिति पर निर्भर नहीं होनी चाहिए। 🇮🇳 हर विद्यार्थी को वही Quality Study Material, MCQs, Quizzes, Exam Preparation, Concept-Based Learning और Bilingual Support मिलना चाहिए, जो आमतौर पर महंगी Coaching या Premium Platforms में मिलता है। Muft Shiksha™ 🇮🇳 इसी सोच के साथ बनाया गया है

Subjects

Social Science

Differing Strands within the Movement

Class 10 Social Science explores how India’s national movement brought together groups with different experiences, demands and expectations. Students examine the participation of peasants, tribal communities, plantation workers, business groups, workers, women, Dalits and Muslims, and see why their involvement did not always follow the same path. The topic highlights both the strength of collective action and the social tensions and limits within nationalism in India.

Expert · Level 6 · 25 questions

TOPIC PRACTICE

Quiz this set

Up to 25 questions from this page. Select your focus, then start.

25 questions

Choose questions
View options
  1. The mass base expanded but giving disciplined direction to different demands became difficult
  2. The mass base decreased and all demands ended
  3. Colonial rule became stronger and swaraj weakened
  4. Demands of all groups automatically became identical
View options
  1. It could expand the movement’s mass base in villages
  2. It would limit the movement only to cities
  3. It would remove peasant problems from history
  4. It would give rural support to colonial rule
View options
  1. Local anger could sometimes move beyond non-violent national discipline
  2. Peasants had no demands
  3. There were no masses in villages
  4. Talukdars had become leaders of peasants
View options
  1. Because common people’s problems entered the main discussion of the movement
  2. Because people were removed from the movement
  3. Because only officials remained important
  4. Because all local demands were ended
View options
  1. Organisation gave voice and boycott created practical pressure
  2. Organisation weakened peasants and boycott protected talukdars
  3. Both ended forest rights
  4. Both stopped plantation workers
View options
  1. It connected nationalism with villages and everyday problems
  2. It limited nationalism only to royal palaces
  3. It kept peasants out of politics
  4. It made the national movement a meeting of colonial officials
View options
  1. It was also linked with rights culture labour and state control
  2. Tribals had no economic problem
  3. It was only a problem of plantation workers
  4. It was only a dispute of talukdars
View options
  1. Tribal tradition community and way of life were linked with forests
  2. Forests were only urban property
  3. Forest rights had no relation with tribal life
  4. Plantation workers owned forests
View options
  1. It shows strict control over workers’ movement and life
  2. It shows complete freedom of workers
  3. It shows a system of collecting tax from landlords
  4. It shows protection of forest rights
View options
  1. It shows that the movement reached distant labour groups too
  2. It shows that the movement remained only in big cities
  3. It shows that workers had no problems
  4. It shows that swaraj had no relation with workers’ lives
View options
  1. Identifying each region’s group issue leadership and meaning of swaraj separately
  2. Remembering only one slogan
  3. Linking all regions with one cause
  4. Completely leaving out local events
View options
  1. The suffering of social groups and different understandings of swaraj
  2. The number of dates
  3. The administrative list of colonial rule
  4. Only the names of forest laws
View options
  1. All three gave meaning to swaraj through their life conditions
  2. All three supported colonial rule
  3. All three demanded only rent reduction
  4. All three were urban traders
View options
  1. Different demands of Awadh peasants Gudem tribals and Assam plantation workers
  2. Name of only one leader
  3. Only one date
  4. Only one urban meeting
View options
  1. It shows that large movements were formed from common people’s suffering and hope
  2. It removes the role of people
  3. It only tells policies of officials
  4. It makes local experiences unimportant
View options
  1. Peasants wanted relief from unjust rent forced labour and eviction
  2. Peasants wanted to increase talukdars’ power
  3. Peasants wanted to stop plantation workers
  4. Peasants wanted to make forest laws stricter
View options
  1. Forest control and forced labour gave the struggle a more militant direction
  2. Local conditions completely ended the movement
  3. Local conditions increased support for colonial rule
  4. Local conditions reduced peasants’ rent
View options
  1. The common word was one but each group gave it meaning through its suffering
  2. All three groups understood swaraj in exactly the same way
  3. Swaraj had no relation with any local experience
  4. Swaraj was only an idea of foreign trade
View options
  1. National inspiration could be similar but local method could be different
  2. There was no national connection in either
  3. The Gudem movement was completely urban
  4. Gandhian non-cooperation was meant to make forest laws stricter
View options
  1. Treating the demands of all groups as the same
  2. Connecting Awadh with peasant movement
  3. Connecting Gudem with tribal movement
  4. Connecting Assam with plantation workers
View options
  1. People joined the movement not by order but through their suffering and hope
  2. People joined the movement without any reason
  3. Everyone had exactly the same demands
  4. Popular participation had no historical importance
View options
  1. Diverse local struggles gradually joined a shared hope of swaraj
  2. All local struggles remained separate from nationalism
  3. The movement remained limited to the elite
  4. Swaraj developed no popular meaning
View options
  1. Studying region group issue leadership and meaning of swaraj together
  2. Remembering only one date and one name
  3. Linking all groups with one demand
  4. Leaving out local experiences
View options
  1. Indian nationalism became a mass movement through local sufferings joining a shared hope of swaraj
  2. Indian nationalism was only one leader’s plan
  3. Peasants tribals and workers had no role in Indian nationalism
  4. Local life had no importance in Indian nationalism
View options
  1. Making pairs of Awadh peasants rent forced labour Gudem tribals forest rights and Assam workers return home
  2. Connecting all examples only with foreign trade
  3. Remembering only one leader’s name
  4. Completely removing local issues

Add Muft Shiksha to your Home Screen

In Safari, tap Share, then Add to Home Screen.