Update

Muft Shiksha™ एक 100% Free Education Portal है 🇮🇳, जिसका उद्देश्य Class 9–12 के हर विद्यार्थी तक High-Quality Education को पूरी तरह मुफ्त पहुँचाना है। 🇮🇳 हम मानते हैं कि अच्छी शिक्षा किसी student की आर्थिक स्थिति पर निर्भर नहीं होनी चाहिए। 🇮🇳 हर विद्यार्थी को वही Quality Study Material, MCQs, Quizzes, Exam Preparation, Concept-Based Learning और Bilingual Support मिलना चाहिए, जो आमतौर पर महंगी Coaching या Premium Platforms में मिलता है। Muft Shiksha™ 🇮🇳 इसी सोच के साथ बनाया गया है

Subjects

Social Science

Differing Strands within the Movement

Class 10 Social Science explores how India’s national movement brought together groups with different experiences, demands and expectations. Students examine the participation of peasants, tribal communities, plantation workers, business groups, workers, women, Dalits and Muslims, and see why their involvement did not always follow the same path. The topic highlights both the strength of collective action and the social tensions and limits within nationalism in India.

Expert · Level 4 · 25 questions

TOPIC PRACTICE

Quiz this set

Up to 25 questions from this page. Select your focus, then start.

25 questions

Choose questions
View options
  1. Because it seemed to break the system of controlled labour
  2. Because it increased demand for foreign goods
  3. Because it increased landlords' rent
  4. Because it strengthened forest laws
View options
  1. Funds, organisation, and swadeshi promotion became stronger
  2. Forest laws expanded
  3. Control over plantation workers increased
  4. Peasant eviction increased
View options
  1. When mass movement seemed to threaten market and property stability
  2. When boycott of foreign goods began
  3. When demand for Indian goods rose
  4. When swadeshi industries received protection
View options
  1. Nationalism was a shared idea but its experience changed by class and region
  2. Nationalism was only an event of one city
  3. Economic interests had no role in nationalism
  4. Rural society was absent from nationalism
View options
  1. Plantation workers saw swaraj as freedom to return home
  2. Merchants saw swaraj as expansion of forest laws
  3. Tribals linked swaraj with import of foreign goods
  4. Peasants linked swaraj with increasing rent
View options
  1. The movement moved beyond cities into everyday social struggles
  2. The movement became limited to business meetings only
  3. The movement turned into support for colonial rule
  4. The movement became a completely official programme
View options
  1. The urban middle class stressed institutional boycott while peasants rose against local exploitation
  2. The urban middle class demanded forest rights while peasants demanded leaving plantations
  3. Both demanded only expansion of foreign trade
  4. Both stayed completely away from the movement
View options
  1. Merchants wanted protection, peasants wanted rent relief, and workers wanted better working conditions
  2. All groups came with only one demand
  3. No group had any economic interest
  4. All groups supported foreign rule
View options
  1. Some local struggles could move in a direction different from national leadership's strategy
  2. People's participation could completely end
  3. The idea of swaraj would immediately disappear
  4. Foreign rule would become completely popular
View options
  1. Because they began to see local exploitation as linked with the wider system of power
  2. Because they wanted to give landlords more power
  3. Because they wanted to trade in foreign goods
  4. Because they wanted to go to work on plantations
View options
  1. It connected swaraj with real freedom over forests and livelihood
  2. It limited swaraj only to council elections
  3. It made tribal society a supporter of colonial rule
  4. It increased trade in foreign cloth
View options
  1. Because local conditions produced armed resistance
  2. Because there was no colonial oppression there
  3. Because tribal society gave up forest rights
  4. Because the movement was limited only to school boycott
View options
  1. Because it was also linked with dignity, security, and opposition to unjust power
  2. Because it had no relation with peasant livelihood
  3. Because it was a demand to buy foreign goods
  4. Because it was a demand to restrict plantation workers' movement
View options
  1. For merchants it was market protection and for people it was a symbol of national dignity
  2. For merchants it was forest rights and for people it was forced labour
  3. It had no meaning for either group
  4. It was only another name for plantation laws
View options
  1. The interests of all classes could not come equally to the centre of the national movement
  2. Workers never noticed the national movement
  3. The business class was completely outside the movement
  4. Peasant demands were also completely absent
View options
  1. Many groups joined but filled the movement with their own different demands
  2. Only one class participated and there was no difference
  3. Rural life had no entry into the movement
  4. The movement ran only by government order
View options
  1. They became a base for boycott and collective decisions in villages
  2. They became centres for recruitment into the colonial army
  3. They became institutions for importing foreign goods
  4. They became tools to restrict plantation workers
View options
  1. Because their main problem was tied labour and restriction on movement
  2. Because they were interested only in boycotting courts
  3. Because they wanted to deliver speeches in councils
  4. Because they wanted to increase the sale of foreign cloth
View options
  1. Because they emotionally connected ordinary people with the movement
  2. Because they increased rather than ended colonial repression
  3. Because they were only tools of business profit
  4. Because they limited the movement completely to cities
View options
  1. Because it shows that the freedom struggle was a combination of many experiences
  2. Because it proves that all groups had the same demand
  3. Because it proves the absence of rural society
  4. Because it proves the popularity of colonial rule
View options
  1. Because each class understood boycott according to its own problem and interest
  2. Because boycott had no economic or political meaning
  3. Because boycott applied only to plantation workers
  4. Because boycott strengthened foreign rule
View options
  1. Peasants faced rent, tribals faced forest control, and workers faced labour control
  2. All groups had equal rights and freedom
  3. Only the business class was exploited and no one else
  4. Economic exploitation had no relation with the national movement
View options
  1. Because their interests, methods, and immediate demands were different
  2. Because all groups had adopted the same occupation
  3. Because no group was interested in swaraj
  4. Because all groups were satisfied with colonial rule
View options
  1. The national movement was a shared struggle, but it contained many social meanings
  2. The national movement had no social meaning
  3. The national movement was only the economic demand of one class
  4. The national movement was an extension of colonial rule
View options
  1. Because the masses made the movement broader and livelier through their struggles
  2. Because common people had no contribution to the movement
  3. Because peasants and workers always supported colonial rule
  4. Because tribal movements had no relation with national history

Add Muft Shiksha to your Home Screen

In Safari, tap Share, then Add to Home Screen.