Muft Shiksha™ एक 100% Free Education Portal है 🇮🇳, जिसका उद्देश्य Class 9–12 के हर विद्यार्थी तक High-Quality Education को पूरी तरह मुफ्त पहुँचाना है। 🇮🇳 हम मानते हैं कि अच्छी शिक्षा किसी student की आर्थिक स्थिति पर निर्भर नहीं होनी चाहिए। 🇮🇳 हर विद्यार्थी को वही Quality Study Material, MCQs, Quizzes, Exam Preparation, Concept-Based Learning और Bilingual Support मिलना चाहिए, जो आमतौर पर महंगी Coaching या Premium Platforms में मिलता है। Muft Shiksha™ 🇮🇳 इसी सोच के साथ बनाया गया है
In this Class 10 Mathematics topic from the Real Numbers chapter, students learn how to prove that √2, √3 and √5 are irrational numbers. The proof begins by assuming that a square root can be written as a fraction p/q in lowest terms, then uses prime divisibility and the resulting contradiction to reject that assumption. Students also strengthen their understanding of rational and irrational numbers, prime factorisation, and the logical structure used in mathematical proofs.
TOPIC PRACTICE
Quiz this set
Up to 25 questions from this page. Select your focus, then start.
25 questions
Choose questions
Expert · Level 4View options
(5\mid x) and then multiple form
(x=5) necessarily
(x) is zero
(x) is divisible by (2)
Expert · Level 4View options
For prime (r), assuming (\sqrt{r}) rational makes (r) divide both numerator and denominator
For every (r), (\sqrt{r}=r)
The square root of every odd (r) is an integer
Every square root is proved using decimals
Expert · Level 4View options
(4k^2=2q^2) was not divided correctly by (2)
Writing (p=2k) itself is wrong
(q) is always zero
(k) must be (2)
Expert · Level 4View options
(2)
(3)
(5)
(7)
Expert · Level 4View options
Assume (\sqrt{3}=\frac{p}{q}), then (p^2=3q^2), then (3\mid p), then (3\mid q)
Assume (p=q), then (\sqrt{3}=1)
Assume (q=0), then contradiction
Assume (\sqrt{3}=3), then (p^2=q^2)
Expert · Level 4View options
There is a contradiction in the assumption
(a) and (b) are truly coprime
(\sqrt{3}) is rational
(m=n=0)
Expert · Level 4View options
It shows (\sqrt{5}) is not an integer, but full irrationality needs contradiction proof
It directly shows (\sqrt{5}=5)
It shows that (5) is even
It makes the denominator zero
Expert · Level 4View options
(\sqrt{2}) is rational
(2) is prime
(q\neq0)
(p) is an integer
Expert · Level 4View options
Putting (p=3k) gives (q^2=3k^2), so (3\mid q)
Putting (p=3k) gives (q=3)
Putting (p=3k) gives (q=p)
Putting (p=3k) gives (q) even
Expert · Level 4View options
Being even alone is not the reason; the proof needs contradiction of a lowest-form fraction
The square root of every even number is irrational
(2) is not even
(\sqrt{2}) is rational
Expert · Level 4View options
It is also necessary that (y\neq0)
It is necessary that (y=0)
It is necessary that (x=y)
Both (x) and (y) must be decimals
Expert · Level 4View options
Both have (3) as a common factor
Both have no common factor
Both are zero
Both are perfect squares
Expert · Level 4View options
If the number were odd, its square would be odd; but the square is even, so the number is even
The square of every odd number is even
The square of every even number is odd
A square has no relation with parity
Expert · Level 4View options
(5) is prime
(5) is even
(y) is zero
(y) is negative
Expert · Level 4View options
Because the right side is the product of (3) and (b^2)
Because (b=3)
Because (a=b)
Because (3) is a perfect square
Expert · Level 4View options
When both (p) and (q) are proved even
When (\sqrt{2}) is squared
When (2) is taken positive
When (q\neq0) is written
Expert · Level 4View options
Hence our rational assumption is false, so (\sqrt{5}) is irrational
Hence (5) is irrational
Hence (\sqrt{5}=5)
Hence (p=q)
Expert · Level 4View options
(b^2) is divisible by (3)
(b^2) is divisible by (2)
(b=1)
(a=b)
Expert · Level 4View options
Because (\sqrt{4}=2) is a rational integer
Because (4) is prime
Because (\sqrt{4}) is not defined
Because (4) is negative
Expert · Level 4View options
(x) and (y) are coprime
(x) is divisible by (5)
(y) is divisible by (5)
(5) is a common factor
Expert · Level 4View options
(3) acts as a prime factor that reaches both numerator and denominator
(3) makes the denominator zero
(3) makes the fraction an integer
(3) is changed into (2)
Expert · Level 4View options
Both have (2) as a common factor
Both are coprime
Both are zero
Both are prime
Expert · Level 4View options
(x) is necessarily divisible by (25)
(x^2) is divisible by (5)
(x) is divisible by (5)
(x=5m) can be written
Expert · Level 4View options
Write lowest rational form, squaring, prime divisibility, and coprime contradiction in order
Memorize only decimal values
Treat every square root as an integer
Put (q=0) in every proof
Expert · Level 4View options
To show a contradiction with coprimality of the lowest-form fraction
To prove that (p=q)
To prove that (\sqrt{3}) is an integer
To show that (q=0)
Question 1ExpertLevel 4
In the irrationality proof of (\sqrt{5}), what idea is hidden in moving from (5\mid x^2) to (x=5m)?
Correct answer: A
Step 1: First, by the prime rule, (5\mid x). Step 2: Divisibility is written in multiple form, so (x=5m). Step 3: In the proof, write these two small steps clearly.
Which statement correctly generalizes the proof of irrationality of (\sqrt{3})?
Correct answer: A
Step 1: In (\sqrt{3}), the prime nature of (3) gives the common factor. Step 2: The same method can be applied to any prime (r). Step 3: While generalizing, do not forget the condition that (r) is prime.
If someone writes (q^2=4k^2) after putting (p=2k) in (p^2=2q^2), where is the mistake?
Correct answer: A
Step 1: Putting (p=2k) gives (4k^2=2q^2). Step 2: Dividing both sides by (2) gives (2k^2=q^2), that is (q^2=2k^2). Step 3: A simplification error can spoil the proof.
In the proof for (\sqrt{2}), if both (p) and (q) are even, by which number can the fraction be further reduced?
Correct answer: A
Step 1: Being even means being divisible by (2). Step 2: If both (p) and (q) are even, (\frac{p}{q}) can be reduced by (2). Step 3: This contradicts lowest form.
Which option shows the correct order for proving the irrationality of (\sqrt{3})?
Correct answer: A
Step 1: The rational assumption begins with a lowest-form fraction. Step 2: Squaring gives (p^2=3q^2), and then (3) divides first (p), then (q). Step 3: This order makes the answer organized.
If (a) and (b) are coprime but the proof gives (a=3m) and (b=3n), what conclusion follows?
Correct answer: A
Step 1: (a=3m) and (b=3n) show that both are divisible by (3). Step 2: Thus (3) becomes a common factor. Step 3: This conflicts with the starting condition of coprimality.
How does (5) not being a perfect square help in understanding the irrationality of (\sqrt{5})?
Correct answer: A
Step 1: Since (5) is not a perfect square, (\sqrt{5}) cannot be an integer. Step 2: But to prove irrationality, we must also show it is not any rational fraction. Step 3: That is why the contradiction proof is written.
In the proof for (\sqrt{2}), when both (p) and (q) turn out even, which initial statement is proved false?
Correct answer: A
Step 1: We initially assumed that (\sqrt{2}) is rational. Step 2: That assumption led to a common factor in a lowest-form fraction. Step 3: Therefore the initial rational assumption is proved false.
Which option gives the correct reasoning to reach (q) in the proof for (\sqrt{3})?
Correct answer: A
Step 1: Substitute (p=3k) in (p^2=3q^2). Step 2: Simplifying gives (q^2=3k^2), so (3\mid q^2) and (3\mid q). Step 3: This is the second divisibility step.
If someone says (\sqrt{2}) is irrational because (2) is even, what is the correct correction?
Correct answer: A
Step 1: The fact that (2) is even is not enough by itself. Step 2: The real proof assumes (\sqrt{2}) rational and shows numerator and denominator both even. Step 3: Write the full reason, not a short guess.
While taking (x) and (y) coprime in the proof for (\sqrt{5}), what must be kept in mind?
Correct answer: A
Step 1: In a rational number (\frac{x}{y}), the denominator cannot be zero. Step 2: So along with (x,y) being coprime integers, (y\neq0) must also be written. Step 3: Complete conditions make the proof stronger.
If (3\mid a) and (3\mid b), what contradiction arises with assuming (\frac{a}{b}) in lowest form?
Correct answer: A
Step 1: (3\mid a) and (3\mid b) mean both are multiples of (3). Step 2: So the fraction can be reduced by (3). Step 3: This is not possible in lowest form.
Which option correctly explains the parity idea in the proof for (\sqrt{2})?
Correct answer: A
Step 1: The square of an odd number is always odd. Step 2: When the square is even, the original number cannot be odd. Step 3: This idea proves both (p) and (q) even.
In the proof for (\sqrt{5}), which condition is necessary while taking (5\mid y) from (5\mid y^2)?
Correct answer: A
Step 1: The step from (5\mid y^2) to (5\mid y) uses the prime-divisibility rule. Step 2: Since (5) is prime, the conclusion is valid. Step 3: Without mentioning primality, this step looks incomplete.
If (a^2=3b^2) is obtained in proving (\sqrt{3}) irrational, why is it correct to say (a^2) is a multiple of (3)?
Correct answer: A
Step 1: In (3b^2), (3) is clearly a factor. Step 2: Since (a^2) equals this, (a^2) is also a multiple of (3). Step 3: Then the prime rule gives divisibility of (a).
At which point is coprimality used decisively in the proof for (\sqrt{2})?
Correct answer: A
Step 1: Coprimality means there is no common factor. Step 2: When both (p) and (q) are proved even, (2) becomes a common factor. Step 3: At this point, coprimality gives the decisive contradiction.
Which option gives the correct final sentence for proving the irrationality of (\sqrt{5})?
Correct answer: A
Step 1: The proof gets a common-factor contradiction from the rational assumption. Step 2: The contradiction proves that assumption false. Step 3: End clearly by writing that (\sqrt{5}) is irrational.
In the proof for (\sqrt{3}), after putting (a=3k), what becomes clear from (b^2=3k^2)?
Correct answer: A
Step 1: In (b^2=3k^2), the right side is a multiple of (3). Step 2: Therefore (b^2) is divisible by (3). Step 3: Then use (3\mid b) to complete the contradiction.
If (\sqrt{4}) is used instead of (\sqrt{2}), why will the same contradiction proof not apply?
Correct answer: A
Step 1: (4) is a perfect square. Step 2: (\sqrt{4}=2), which is rational and an integer. Step 3: The irrationality contradiction proof is not applied to perfect squares.
In the proof for (\sqrt{5}), if both (x) and (y) are divisible by (5), which statement would be false?
Correct answer: A
Step 1: Both being divisible by (5) shows that (5) is a common factor. Step 2: Coprime numbers cannot have such a common factor. Step 3: Therefore the statement that they are coprime is proved false.
Which option correctly states the role of (3) in the proof of irrationality of (\sqrt{3})?
Correct answer: A
Step 1: From (p^2=3q^2), (3) first appears in (p). Step 2: Then putting (p=3k) makes (3) appear in (q) too. Step 3: This gives a common factor in numerator and denominator.
Which option gives an incorrect conclusion about (x) from (x^2=5y^2) in the proof for (\sqrt{5})?
Correct answer: A
Step 1: From (x^2=5y^2), we get (5\mid x^2) and then (5\mid x). Step 2: This does not necessarily mean that (x) is divisible by (25). Step 3: Write only what is proved.
What is the best exam tip related to the irrationality of (\sqrt{2}), (\sqrt{3}), and (\sqrt{5})?
Correct answer: A
Step 1: First write (\frac{p}{q}) in lowest form. Step 2: Then square and use the related prime factor to show divisibility of both numerator and denominator. Step 3: Finally state the contradiction with coprimality clearly.
If assuming (\sqrt{3}=\frac{p}{q}) gives (p^2=3q^2), what is the main purpose of showing divisibility by (3) for both (p) and (q) in the proof?
Correct answer: A
Step 1: Assuming (\sqrt{3}) rational, (\frac{p}{q}) is taken in lowest form. Step 2: The proof gives (3\mid p) and (3\mid q), so (3) is a common factor of both. Step 3: A lowest-form fraction cannot have a common factor, so (\sqrt{3}) is proved irrational.
Google Analytics helps us understand site usage. Google may send limited cookie-free signals before your choice. The Live Visitors widget operates independently of this analytics choice; see the privacy policy for its provider and fallback details. Essential site features work without analytics cookies. You can change your choice later in Privacy choices. Privacy policy