Muft Shiksha™ एक 100% Free Education Portal है 🇮🇳, जिसका उद्देश्य Class 9–12 के हर विद्यार्थी तक High-Quality Education को पूरी तरह मुफ्त पहुँचाना है। 🇮🇳 हम मानते हैं कि अच्छी शिक्षा किसी student की आर्थिक स्थिति पर निर्भर नहीं होनी चाहिए। 🇮🇳 हर विद्यार्थी को वही Quality Study Material, MCQs, Quizzes, Exam Preparation, Concept-Based Learning और Bilingual Support मिलना चाहिए, जो आमतौर पर महंगी Coaching या Premium Platforms में मिलता है। Muft Shiksha™ 🇮🇳 इसी सोच के साथ बनाया गया है
Proof of irrationality of square root 2 and square root 3
√2 और √3 की अपरिमेयता का प्रमाण
In Class 9 Mathematics, this Number Systems topic explains how to prove that √2 and √3 are irrational numbers. Students use proof by contradiction: they assume a square root can be written as a fraction in lowest terms, then apply prime-factor and divisibility properties to show that the assumption leads to an impossibility. The lesson strengthens understanding of rational and irrational numbers, factors, parity, and the logic of mathematical proof, while helping learners present each step clearly and accurately.
Practice questions
01 In the proof of (\sqrt{3}), why is it incomplete to write directly from (p^2=3q^2) that (q) is divisible by (3)?
0 reads0 helpful★ – (0)
Answer and explanation
Correct answer: B. First (p) must be proved divisible by (3) and (p=3k) must be used
Explanation: First (p) is proved divisible by (3) from (p^2). Then after putting (p=3k), the conclusion for (q) follows.
02 A student says that since 5 is a rational number, \(5+\sqrt{3}\) must also be rational. Which statement correctly identifies the error in the argument?
0 reads0 helpful★ – (0)
Answer and explanation
Correct answer: A. If \(5+\sqrt{3}\) were rational, subtracting 5 would make \(\sqrt{3}\) rational, which is impossible.
Explanation: Assume \(5+\sqrt{3}\) is rational. Subtracting the rational number 5 would then make \(\sqrt{3}\) rational, contradicting its irrationality. Exam tip: rational minus rational is always rational.
03 Which statement is used to move from p² to p in the proof of √3?
0 reads0 helpful★ – (0)
Answer and explanation
Correct answer: D. If p² is divisible by 3, then p is divisible by 3
Explanation: The relevant number-theory fact is Euclid’s lemma for a prime: if a prime divides the square of an integer, it divides the integer itself. In this proof, √3 = p/q leads to p² = 3q², so 3 divides p². Since 3 is prime, 3 must divide p, and we may write p = 3k for some integer k. This step is essential because substituting p = 3k into the equation subsequently shows that 3 also divides q, producing the contradiction with gcd(p,q)=1. Therefore option D is correct. Option A uses the wrong prime, while B and C do not follow from divisibility and are not valid number-theory conclusions.
04 Suppose a student writes \(\sqrt{3}=\frac{p}{q}\), where \(p\) and \(q\) are coprime, while proving that \(\sqrt{3}\) is irrational. From \(p^2=3q^2\), which conclusion about \(p\) is correct?
0 reads0 helpful★ – (0)
Answer and explanation
Correct answer: A. Since 3 is prime and \(3\mid p^2\), therefore \(3\mid p\).
Explanation: From \(p^2=3q^2\), we get \(3\mid p^2\). Since 3 is prime, divisibility of a square by 3 implies \(3\mid p\). Substituting \(p=3k\) then makes \(q\) divisible by 3 too, contradicting coprimality. Exam tip: use the prime-divides-square rule in such proofs.
Correct answer: B. Because a rational number is written as a fraction in lowest form
Explanation: Every rational number can be represented as a quotient of integers, and any common factor can be cancelled. Consequently, for a proof by contradiction, we choose √3 = p/q in lowest form, meaning p and q are coprime and q ≠ 0. This choice is crucial: from p² = 3q² the proof shows that 3 divides p and then that 3 divides q. If p and q were already coprime, their both being divisible by 3 would be impossible, giving the required contradiction. Therefore option B is correct. Option A is an unsupported claim, C violates the definition of a fraction, and D is not required for a rational representation.
06 If (p) and (q) are coprime, which situation is impossible in the proof of (\sqrt{3})?
0 reads0 helpful★ – (0)
Answer and explanation
Correct answer: D. Both have common factor (3)
Explanation: The correct answer is option D: both p and q have the common factor 3. Coprime integers are integers whose only positive common factor is 1. In the irrationality proof, p/q is deliberately chosen in lowest terms, so p and q must not share any factor other than 1. The equations first show that 3 divides p and then that 3 divides q. Therefore 3 is a common factor, which is impossible under the coprime assumption. Option A, q≠0, is not impossible; it is actually required so that p/q is defined. Option B, both are integers, is also required in a rational representation. Option C is simply the meaning of p in the chosen fraction and causes no contradiction. Option D is impossible because it violates the lowest-terms condition. This contradiction shows that the original assumption that sqrt{3} is rational must be false. Memory cue: ‘coprime’ means no common factor survives except 1.
07 If \(\sqrt{3}\) is assumed to be \(\frac{p}{q}\) in lowest terms, what conclusion follows from \(p^2=3q^2\)?
0 reads0 helpful★ – (0)
Answer and explanation
Correct answer: A. \(p\) is divisible by 3
Explanation: In \(p^2=3q^2\), the right side is divisible by 3, so \(p^2\) is divisible by 3. Since 3 is prime, this implies that \(p\) is divisible by 3. Substitution then shows \(q\) is also divisible by 3, contradicting lowest terms. Exam tip: use prime divisibility of a square carefully.
09 Why is the proof of \(\sqrt{2}\) valid without decimal expansion?
0 reads0 helpful★ – (0)
Answer and explanation
Correct answer: C. Because the proof is based on parity and a contradiction involving coprime integers
Explanation: To prove that \(\sqrt{2}\) is irrational, assume \(\sqrt{2}=p/q\), where \(p\) and \(q\) are coprime. Squaring gives \(p^2=2q^2\), so \(p\) is even. This then shows that \(q\) is also even, contradicting the fact that \(p\) and \(q\) are coprime. Hence, no decimal expansion is needed. Exam tip: In a contradiction proof, state the coprime condition clearly.
10 While proving \(\sqrt{3}\) irrational by contradiction, suppose \(\sqrt{3}=\frac{p}{q}\), where \(p\) and \(q\) are coprime integers. What follows immediately from \(p^2=3q^2\)?
0 reads0 helpful★ – (0)
Answer and explanation
Correct answer: A. 3 divides \(p\)
Explanation: From \(p^2=3q^2\), \(p^2\) is divisible by 3. Since 3 is prime, divisibility of \(p^2\) by 3 implies that \(p\) is divisible by 3. Only after writing \(p=3k\) can we show that \(q\) is also divisible by 3, contradicting coprimality. Exam tip: use the prime-divisor property for squares.
11 What is the combined conclusion of the proofs of (\sqrt{2}) and (\sqrt{3})?
0 reads0 helpful★ – (0)
Answer and explanation
Correct answer: D. Both are irrational
Explanation: The key idea is that a number is irrational when it cannot be written as a fraction of two integers in lowest form. The standard contradiction proofs assume that \(\sqrt{2}\) or \(\sqrt{3}\) is rational and then show that the numerator and denominator must share a prime factor. This contradicts the assumption that the fraction was already in lowest terms.
For \(\sqrt{2}\), the equation becomes \(p^2=2q^2\), forcing both \(p\) and \(q\) to be even. For \(\sqrt{3}\), it becomes \(p^2=3q^2\), forcing both to be divisible by 3. Thus neither square root is rational. Therefore option D, both are irrational, follows.
13 Before proving the irrationality of \(\sqrt{3}\) by contradiction, in what form must \(\frac{p}{q}\) be assumed?
0 reads0 helpful★ – (0)
Answer and explanation
Correct answer: A. p and q are coprime
Explanation: The fraction \(\frac{p}{q}\) is taken in lowest terms, so p and q are coprime. The proof gives \(3\mid p^2\Rightarrow3\mid p\), and then \(3\mid q\), a contradiction. Exam tip: always state “lowest terms.”
14 In the proof that
\(\sqrt{3}\) is irrational, suppose
\(\sqrt{3}=p/q\) is in lowest terms and squaring gives
\(p^2=3q^2\). What correctly fixes a student's error that
\(3\mid p^2\) does not imply
\(3\mid p\)?
0 reads0 helpful★ – (0)
Answer and explanation
Correct answer: A. Since 3 is prime, \(3\mid p^2\) implies \(3\mid p\)
Explanation: Squaring gives \(3\mid p^2\). Since 3 is prime, it must divide \(p\). Putting \(p=3k\) then shows that 3 divides \(q\) too, contradicting lowest terms. Exam tip: state the prime-divisor rule.
15 Which initial assumption is made to prove the irrationality of \(\sqrt{2}\) by the method of contradiction?
0 reads0 helpful★ – (0)
Answer and explanation
Correct answer: A. \(\sqrt{2}=\frac{p}{q}\), where \(p,q\) are coprime integers and \(q\ne0\)
Explanation: Assume \(\sqrt{2}=p/q\) with coprime integers. Squaring gives \(2q^2=p^2\); this eventually makes both integers even, contradicting coprimality. Exam tip: always state that the fraction is in lowest terms.
16 A student argues that if \(\sqrt{3}=\frac{p}{q}\), where \(p\) and \(q\) are coprime integers, then \(p^2=3q^2\) proves only that \(p\) is divisible by 3. Identify the student's error.
0 reads0 helpful★ – (0)
Answer and explanation
Correct answer: A. If \(p\) is divisible by 3, putting \(p=3k\) shows that \(q\) is also divisible by 3, contradicting coprimality.
Explanation: From \(p^2=3q^2\), \(p\) is divisible by 3, so let \(p=3k\). Substitution gives \(9k^2=3q^2\), hence \(q^2=3k^2\), so \(q\) is also divisible by 3. This contradicts coprimality. Exam tip: complete the argument by proving a common factor of both \(p\) and \(q\).
17 Which statement gives both correct reason and conclusion in the proof of (\sqrt{3})?
0 reads0 helpful★ – (0)
Answer and explanation
Correct answer: B. Rational assumption makes both (p,q) divisible by (3), so (\sqrt{3}) is irrational
Explanation: The correct answer is option B. Assume for contradiction that sqrt{3} is rational and write it as p/q in lowest terms, with p and q integers, q≠0, and no common factor. Squaring gives p²=3q². Since 3 divides p² and 3 is prime, 3 divides p. Write p=3k. Substitution gives 9k²=3q², so q²=3k². Applying the same rule again shows that 3 divides q. Thus both p and q are divisible by 3, contradicting their being coprime. Therefore the rational assumption is false and sqrt{3} is irrational. Option A is wrong because p=q is not assumed and would not prove irrationality. Option C is wrong because q=0 is forbidden, not a valid proof reason. Option D is wrong because the size of a decimal does not determine rationality; rational numbers can have large decimals, and irrationality requires proof. Option B gives both the reason and conclusion. Exam cue: contradiction with lowest terms proves irrationality.
18 Riya says that \(\sqrt{3}\) is rational because its decimal form is \(1.732\). Which statement correctly identifies the error in her claim?
0 reads0 helpful★ – (0)
Answer and explanation
Correct answer: B. \(1.732\) is only an approximation; assuming \(\sqrt{3}=p/q\) in lowest terms leads to a contradiction.
Explanation: \(1.732^2=2.999824\), not 3, so it is only an approximation. If \(\sqrt{3}=p/q\), then \(p^2=3q^2\) makes both \(p\) and \(q\) divisible by 3, contradicting lowest terms. Exam tip: never treat a rounded decimal as an exact value.
Explanation: The equation p = 3k is the standard algebraic way to express that 3 divides p. In the proof, p² = 3q² first shows that 3 divides p². Since 3 is prime, a prime-divisibility result gives 3 | p, so there is an integer k such that p = 3k. Substituting this form into p² = 3q² gives 9k² = 3q² and hence q² = 3k², which then shows that 3 also divides q. This eventually contradicts the assumption that p and q are coprime. Thus option D is correct. The equation does not say p is zero, equal to q, or even; those claims are not implied by p = 3k.
20 While proving the irrationality of \(\sqrt{3}\) by contradiction, suppose \(\sqrt{3}=\frac{p}{q}\), where \(p\) and \(q\) are coprime. What is the first conclusion obtained from \(3q^2=p^2\)?
0 reads0 helpful★ – (0)
Answer and explanation
Correct answer: A. 3 divides \(p\)
Explanation: Since \(3q^2=p^2\), \(p^2\) is divisible by 3. As 3 is prime, \(p\) must be divisible by 3. Substituting \(p=3k\) later makes \(q\) divisible by 3 too, contradicting coprimality. Exam tip: use prime divisibility of squares.
21 A student says that if \(\sqrt{2}=\frac{p}{q}\), then both \(p\) and \(q\) may be even. Why is this statement incorrect in the proof that \(\sqrt{2}\) is irrational?
0 reads0 helpful★ – (0)
Answer and explanation
Correct answer: A. The assumed fraction \(\frac{p}{q}\) must be in lowest terms; if both are even, it can be reduced by 2.
Explanation: In proof by contradiction, assume \(\sqrt{2}=\frac{p}{q}\) in lowest terms. If both are even, write \(p=2m, q=2n\); cancelling 2 gives a smaller equivalent fraction, a contradiction. Exam tip: always state that \(p/q\) is in lowest terms.
22 If assuming √2 is rational gives a contradiction, which assumption is proved false?
0 reads0 helpful★ – (0)
Answer and explanation
Correct answer: C. √2 is rational
Explanation: A proof by contradiction begins by temporarily assuming the statement opposite to the desired conclusion. To prove that √2 is irrational, we assume that √2 is rational and write it as p/q in lowest form. The algebra and divisibility arguments then force both p and q to be divisible by 2, contradicting their coprimality. The contradiction therefore rejects the temporary assumption that √2 is rational. It does not reject the facts that √2 is real, positive, or greater than zero; those facts remain true. Hence option C is correct. Options A, B, and D describe valid properties of √2 and are not the assumption targeted by the contradiction.
23 A student assumes that \(\sqrt{2}=\frac{p}{q}\), where \(p\) and \(q\) are coprime integers. On squaring, the student gets \(p^2=2q^2\). Which conclusion proves that this assumption is invalid?
0 reads0 helpful★ – (0)
Answer and explanation
Correct answer: A. Both \(p\) and \(q\) are even
Explanation: From \(p^2=2q^2\), \(p^2\), and hence \(p\), is even. Put \(p=2k\); then \(q^2=2k^2\), so \(q\) is also even. This contradicts coprimality. Exam tip: establish evenness for both integers.
☆No ratings yetWrite a review / Rate this question
Was this question useful?
👍 0 Helpful ·👎 0 Not helpful
Difficulty
Easy0%
Medium0%
Hard0%
Was the explanation clear?
Yes 0%·No 0%
0 responses
Student Reviews
No published reviews yet.
Analytics choices
Google Analytics helps us understand site usage. Google may send limited cookie-free signals before your choice. The Live Visitors widget operates independently of this analytics choice; see the privacy policy for its provider and fallback details. Essential site features work without analytics cookies. You can change your choice later in Privacy choices. Privacy policy