Why is it an incomplete analysis to call the February Revolution completely leaderless?
Answer and explanation
Correct answer: The beginning was spontaneous, but later Duma leaders and Soviet institutions emerged
The February Revolution began through spontaneous strikes, bread protests and demonstrations, so it did not start under one centrally planned leader. However, describing it as completely leaderless ignores the later emergence of organised political authority. Duma leaders helped form the Provisional Government, while the Petrograd Soviet organised workers and soldiers and became an important centre of representation. Hence option A is correct. The Tsar did not lead the revolution, foreign powers did not organise every strike, and peasants did not create the entire government in Petrograd. Leadership developed during the revolutionary process.
Frequently asked questions
What is the correct answer to this question?
The beginning was spontaneous, but later Duma leaders and Soviet institutions emerged
Why is this the correct answer?
The February Revolution began through spontaneous strikes, bread protests and demonstrations, so it did not start under one centrally planned leader. However, describing it as completely leaderless ignores the later emergence of organised political authority. Duma leaders helped form the Provisional Government, while the Petrograd Soviet organised workers and soldiers and became an important centre of representation. Hence option A is correct. The Tsar did not lead the revolution, foreign powers did not organise every strike, and peasants did not create the entire government in Petrograd. Leadership developed during the revolutionary process.
Which subject and chapter does this question cover?
This is a Class 9 History question. Chapter: Socialism in Europe and the Russian Revolution. Topic: The February Revolution in Petrograd.
Student feedback
Was this question useful?
👍 0 Helpful 👎 0 Not helpful
Yes 0% No 0%
0 responsesStudent Reviews
No published reviews yet.
