Why did the government's position worsen by not choosing dialogue instead of repression?
Answer and explanation
Correct answer: The use of force did not end the protests; instead, it increased the alienation of soldiers and people from the government
In February 1917, force was used to suppress demonstrations in Petrograd, but it did not reduce discontent. Many soldiers refused to fire on protesters and joined the people. As a result, the government began to lose support from both the public and the army, rapidly weakening its position. Repression did not solve the food crisis or meet workers' demands. Exam tip: link the soldiers' mutiny with the collapse of government authority in the February Revolution.
Frequently asked questions
What is the correct answer to this question?
The use of force did not end the protests; instead, it increased the alienation of soldiers and people from the government
Why is this the correct answer?
In February 1917, force was used to suppress demonstrations in Petrograd, but it did not reduce discontent. Many soldiers refused to fire on protesters and joined the people. As a result, the government began to lose support from both the public and the army, rapidly weakening its position. Repression did not solve the food crisis or meet workers' demands. Exam tip: link the soldiers' mutiny with the collapse of government authority in the February Revolution.
Which subject and chapter does this question cover?
This is a Class 9 History question. Chapter: Socialism in Europe and the Russian Revolution. Topic: The February Revolution in Petrograd.
Student feedback
Was this question useful?
👍 0 Helpful 👎 0 Not helpful
Yes 0% No 0%
0 responsesStudent Reviews
No published reviews yet.
