Which statement best shows the conflict between state control and community rights in the Bastar rebellion?
Answer and explanation
Correct answer: The government saw forests as sources of revenue and control, while the community saw them as the basis of life
The governing concept is the clash between colonial forest control and customary community rights. Colonial officials treated forests as regulated resources for revenue, timber and administrative control, whereas Bastar communities depended on forests for food, fuel, grazing, cultivation and cultural life. Option A captures this opposing relationship. The other statements deny the importance of forests or introduce irrelevant claims about the sea.
Frequently asked questions
What is the correct answer to this question?
The government saw forests as sources of revenue and control, while the community saw them as the basis of life
Why is this the correct answer?
The governing concept is the clash between colonial forest control and customary community rights. Colonial officials treated forests as regulated resources for revenue, timber and administrative control, whereas Bastar communities depended on forests for food, fuel, grazing, cultivation and cultural life. Option A captures this opposing relationship. The other statements deny the importance of forests or introduce irrelevant claims about the sea.
Which subject and chapter does this question cover?
This is a Class 9 History question. Chapter: Forest Society and Colonialism. Topic: Rebellion in the Forest.
