According to Samin why could the state not own forests?
Answer and explanation
Correct answer: Because the state had not created forests
Samin believed that the state could not own forests because it had not created them. In his view, forests were gifts of nature or God, and local people had customary rights over them. Therefore, option A is correct. Options B, C, and D are factually incorrect statements about forests. Exam tip: link Samin’s idea with opposition to state ownership of forests.
Frequently asked questions
What is the correct answer to this question?
Because the state had not created forests
Why is this the correct answer?
Samin believed that the state could not own forests because it had not created them. In his view, forests were gifts of nature or God, and local people had customary rights over them. Therefore, option A is correct. Options B, C, and D are factually incorrect statements about forests. Exam tip: link Samin’s idea with opposition to state ownership of forests.
Which subject and chapter does this question cover?
This is a Class 9 History question. Chapter: Forest Society and Colonialism. Topic: Forest Transformations in Java.
