Update

Muft Shiksha™ एक 100% Free Education Portal है 🇮🇳, जिसका उद्देश्य Class 9–12 के हर विद्यार्थी तक High-Quality Education को पूरी तरह मुफ्त पहुँचाना है। 🇮🇳 हम मानते हैं कि अच्छी शिक्षा किसी student की आर्थिक स्थिति पर निर्भर नहीं होनी चाहिए। 🇮🇳 हर विद्यार्थी को वही Quality Study Material, MCQs, Quizzes, Exam Preparation, Concept-Based Learning और Bilingual Support मिलना चाहिए, जो आमतौर पर महंगी Coaching या Premium Platforms में मिलता है। Muft Shiksha™ 🇮🇳 इसी सोच के साथ बनाया गया है

Subjects
0 reads0 ratings0 helpful

Why did the government's position worsen by not choosing dialogue instead of repression?

Answer and explanation

Correct answer: The use of force did not end the protests; instead, it increased the alienation of soldiers and people from the government

In February 1917, force was used to suppress demonstrations in Petrograd, but it did not reduce discontent. Many soldiers refused to fire on protesters and joined the people. As a result, the government began to lose support from both the public and the army, rapidly weakening its position. Repression did not solve the food crisis or meet workers' demands. Exam tip: link the soldiers' mutiny with the collapse of government authority in the February Revolution.

Related tags

February RevolutionPetrogradRussian RevolutionRepressionSoldiers MutinyTsarist GovernmentThe February Revolution In PetrogradSocialism In Europe And The Russian Revolution

Was this question useful?

No ratings yetWrite a review / Rate this question

Student Reviews

No published reviews yet.

Add Muft Shiksha to your Home Screen

In Safari, tap Share, then Add to Home Screen.