How was the difference between the Tsar's order and soldiers' behaviour proof of state crisis?

Correct answer: The order was issued but the power to enforce it collapsed

Direct answer: Option A, the order was issued but the power to enforce it collapsed. A state is not strong merely because its ruler gives commands. It also needs officials, police, and soldiers who obey and carry out those commands. During the February Revolution, the Tsar ordered action against demonstrators, but many soldiers refused to fire and some joined the protesters. Step by step: the ruler issued an order; the forces expected to enforce it disobeyed or changed sides; repression therefore failed; the authority of the government weakened sharply. This gap between command and obedience was evidence of a state crisis. Option A is correct because it identifies the breakdown of practical control. Option B is wrong because full support from the Duma would strengthen the Tsar, whereas the situation showed serious opposition and institutional weakness. Option C is wrong because people did not withdraw all demands. Option D is wrong because Russia did not immediately win the war; war problems helped create the crisis. Memory cue: authority means an order plus obedience; an order without enforcement shows weakness.