Update

Muft Shiksha™ एक 100% Free Education Portal है 🇮🇳, जिसका उद्देश्य Class 9–12 के हर विद्यार्थी तक High-Quality Education को पूरी तरह मुफ्त पहुँचाना है। 🇮🇳 हम मानते हैं कि अच्छी शिक्षा किसी student की आर्थिक स्थिति पर निर्भर नहीं होनी चाहिए। 🇮🇳 हर विद्यार्थी को वही Quality Study Material, MCQs, Quizzes, Exam Preparation, Concept-Based Learning और Bilingual Support मिलना चाहिए, जो आमतौर पर महंगी Coaching या Premium Platforms में मिलता है। Muft Shiksha™ 🇮🇳 इसी सोच के साथ बनाया गया है

Subjects
0 reads0 ratings0 helpful

What shows that deforestation was not one-sided development while studying its causes?

Answer and explanation

Correct answer: The colonial economy benefited, while local livelihoods and lives were affected

Under colonial rule, forests were cleared on a large scale for railways, shipbuilding, plantations and agricultural expansion. The government and colonial economy gained timber and revenue, but Adivasi and other local communities lost or faced restrictions on livelihoods, grazing, fuel collection and forest rights. Thus, development did not benefit everyone equally. Option B is incorrect because the benefits were not shared equally. Exam tip: In questions on colonial forest policy, connect economic gains with their impact on local communities.

Related tags

DeforestationColonialismForest SocietyUnequal DevelopmentLocal CommunitiesColonial Forest PolicyWhy Deforestation?Why Deforestation

Was this question useful?

No ratings yetWrite a review / Rate this question

Student Reviews

No published reviews yet.

Add Muft Shiksha to your Home Screen

In Safari, tap Share, then Add to Home Screen.