Update

Muft Shiksha™ एक 100% Free Education Portal है 🇮🇳, जिसका उद्देश्य Class 9–12 के हर विद्यार्थी तक High-Quality Education को पूरी तरह मुफ्त पहुँचाना है। 🇮🇳 हम मानते हैं कि अच्छी शिक्षा किसी student की आर्थिक स्थिति पर निर्भर नहीं होनी चाहिए। 🇮🇳 हर विद्यार्थी को वही Quality Study Material, MCQs, Quizzes, Exam Preparation, Concept-Based Learning और Bilingual Support मिलना चाहिए, जो आमतौर पर महंगी Coaching या Premium Platforms में मिलता है। Muft Shiksha™ 🇮🇳 इसी सोच के साथ बनाया गया है

Subjects
0 reads0 ratings0 helpful

Why can calling deforestation only agricultural development be misleading?

Answer and explanation

Correct answer: Because it included revenue timber railways plantations and local loss

The direct answer is A: deforestation also involved revenue, timber, railways, plantations and losses to local communities. Agriculture was one cause or use, but it was not the whole story. Reasoning: land could be cleared for fields and revenue; timber was needed for railways and construction; commercial plantations replaced natural forests; restrictions reduced customary access and harmed forest dwellers. A is correct because it includes several connected purposes and unequal effects. B is wrong because agriculture did have an important relationship with clearing. C is wrong because forest clearing often harmed or displaced forest dwellers rather than benefiting only them. D is wrong because colonial rule was strongly connected with expanding markets and commercial demand. The phrase “agricultural development” can sound positive and hide coercion, profit and environmental loss. Exam cue: do not give a one-cause or one-sided explanation.

Related tags

Agricultural Development MisleadingWhy Deforestation?Why DeforestationForest Society And ColonialismHistoryClass 9 Mcq

Was this question useful?

No ratings yetWrite a review / Rate this question

Student Reviews

No published reviews yet.

Add Muft Shiksha to your Home Screen

In Safari, tap Share, then Add to Home Screen.