Why should courts examine legal validity rather than merely the government's intention in a case?
Answer and explanation
Correct answer: Because in constitutional governance, government actions must conform to the Constitution and the law
In judicial review, courts examine whether a government action conforms to the Constitution, the law, and the prescribed procedure. A government may have a public-spirited intention, but that intention cannot make an unconstitutional or illegal action valid. Option B is a close distractor because public interest must also be pursued within legal limits. Exam tip: Link ‘legal validity’ with compliance with the Constitution, law, and procedure.
Frequently asked questions
What is the correct answer to this question?
Because in constitutional governance, government actions must conform to the Constitution and the law
Why is this the correct answer?
In judicial review, courts examine whether a government action conforms to the Constitution, the law, and the prescribed procedure. A government may have a public-spirited intention, but that intention cannot make an unconstitutional or illegal action valid. Option B is a close distractor because public interest must also be pursued within legal limits. Exam tip: Link ‘legal validity’ with compliance with the Constitution, law, and procedure.
Which subject and chapter does this question cover?
This is a Class 9 Civics question. Chapter: Working of Institutions. Topic: The Judiciary (Supreme Court, High Courts, and judicial independence).
Student feedback
Was this question useful?
👍 0 Helpful 👎 0 Not helpful
Yes 0% No 0%
0 responsesStudent Reviews
No published reviews yet.
