Why is the policy decision related to the Mandal Commission an important example for understanding the working of institutions?

Correct answer: Because it shows stages such as a government order, parliamentary discussion, and judicial review

Direct answer: A is correct. The Mandal Commission example helps students see that a major public policy is not simply the personal decision of one leader. The government took action through an official order concerning the recommendations, the issue became a matter of public and parliamentary debate, and the courts examined legal and constitutional questions connected with the policy. Thus, the example shows interaction among the political executive, Parliament, administration, citizens, and the judiciary. It also teaches that institutions may check, discuss, and shape a decision rather than merely announce it. B is wrong because the issue concerned public policy and social representation, not sports. C is wrong because several public institutions and groups were involved. D is wrong because it was a government policy matter, not a private company's decision. Memory cue: Mandal is a case study of decision, debate, and review.