Update

Muft Shiksha™ एक 100% Free Education Portal है 🇮🇳, जिसका उद्देश्य Class 9–12 के हर विद्यार्थी तक High-Quality Education को पूरी तरह मुफ्त पहुँचाना है। 🇮🇳 हम मानते हैं कि अच्छी शिक्षा किसी student की आर्थिक स्थिति पर निर्भर नहीं होनी चाहिए। 🇮🇳 हर विद्यार्थी को वही Quality Study Material, MCQs, Quizzes, Exam Preparation, Concept-Based Learning और Bilingual Support मिलना चाहिए, जो आमतौर पर महंगी Coaching या Premium Platforms में मिलता है। Muft Shiksha™ 🇮🇳 इसी सोच के साथ बनाया गया है

Subjects
0 reads0 ratings0 helpful

Why is merely writing rights on paper not enough in democracy?

Answer and explanation

Correct answer: Because rights must also be actually protected

Direct answer: Option A, rights must also be actually protected. Writing a right in a Constitution or law is important, but words alone do not protect a person when an official violates that right. The reasoning is: a right is declared; a violation may still occur; the citizen needs a complaint, court, remedy or other effective protection; only then does the right have practical meaning. Option A is correct because real protection and remedies are necessary. Option B is wrong because democracy needs rights for dignity, equality and participation. Option C is wrong because law should prevent arbitrary action; law is not always arbitrary. Option D is wrong because courts and other remedies help citizens challenge unlawful action. A right on paper without enforcement may be merely formal. For example, if unlawful detention occurs, the person must be able to seek legal review and release. Memory cue: remember ‘right plus remedy equals meaningful right’.

Related tags

Rights On PaperLegal RemedyDemocracy

Was this question useful?

No ratings yetWrite a review / Rate this question

Student Reviews

No published reviews yet.

Add Muft Shiksha to your Home Screen

In Safari, tap Share, then Add to Home Screen.