Why is it necessary for the opposition to ask questions on major decisions?

Correct answer: So the government must give reasons and answers

Correct answer: A — questioning requires the government to explain its reasons and answer concerns. In a democracy, the ruling side has the authority to govern, but it must remain accountable. Opposition members examine proposed decisions, ask for information, point out possible harm, and represent views that may not be reflected in the government’s position. Their questions can reveal weaknesses and encourage corrections, while parliamentary discussion allows the public to understand the policy better. This does not mean the opposition’s purpose is to make the government fall every time. Option A is correct because explanation and scrutiny are central to accountability. B is wrong because questioning does not automatically remove a government. C is wrong because scrutiny may improve a policy rather than prevent all policies. D is wrong because opposition debate does not close courts. A useful distinction is that criticism is not the same as obstruction: responsible questioning can strengthen democratic decision-making. Memory cue: opposition asks, “Why this decision, who benefits, and what safeguards exist?”