Update

Muft Shiksha™ एक 100% Free Education Portal है 🇮🇳, जिसका उद्देश्य Class 9–12 के हर विद्यार्थी तक High-Quality Education को पूरी तरह मुफ्त पहुँचाना है। 🇮🇳 हम मानते हैं कि अच्छी शिक्षा किसी student की आर्थिक स्थिति पर निर्भर नहीं होनी चाहिए। 🇮🇳 हर विद्यार्थी को वही Quality Study Material, MCQs, Quizzes, Exam Preparation, Concept-Based Learning और Bilingual Support मिलना चाहिए, जो आमतौर पर महंगी Coaching या Premium Platforms में मिलता है। Muft Shiksha™ 🇮🇳 इसी सोच के साथ बनाया गया है

Subjects
0 reads0 ratings0 helpful

Why is consent of both Houses considered necessary for an ordinary Bill?

Answer and explanation

Correct answer: Because the law can be considered at two levels

Answer: A. An ordinary Bill is examined through the normal legislative process in both Houses. Lok Sabha brings direct popular representation, while Rajya Sabha brings the perspective of states and provides another stage of scrutiny. Discussion in both Houses can reveal weaknesses, clarify provisions and suggest amendments. Requiring agreement therefore supports wider consideration before a proposal becomes law. A is correct because it expresses this two-stage examination. B is wrong: a Money Bill is introduced only in Lok Sabha, not Rajya Sabha. C is wrong: Rajya Sabha, not Lok Sabha, is the permanent House. D is wrong: Rajya Sabha members are not directly elected by all citizens; most are elected by elected members of State Legislative Assemblies. Memory cue: “Ordinary Bill—both Houses; Money Bill—Lok Sabha has primacy.”

Related tags

Ordinary-BillTwo-HousesLaw-MakingLegislative-ScrutinyParliament (Lok Sabha And Rajya Sabha Powers)Parliament Lok Sabha And Rajya Sabha PowersWorking Of InstitutionsCivics

Was this question useful?

No ratings yetWrite a review / Rate this question

Student Reviews

No published reviews yet.

Add Muft Shiksha to your Home Screen

In Safari, tap Share, then Add to Home Screen.