Why can opposition criticism in policy decisions be seen as a resource rather than an obstruction?

Correct answer: Because it can reveal policy gaps and alternative viewpoints

Correct answer: A. In a democracy, opposition parties scrutinise the government's proposals and speak for concerns that may not be fully represented by the ruling side. Their questions can expose unclear provisions, financial weaknesses, unfair effects, or practical difficulties. Alternative proposals may help the government improve a policy before implementation. A is correct because informed criticism can increase accountability and decision quality. B is wrong because criticism does not always remove a government; governments usually leave through constitutional and political processes such as elections or loss of legislative support. C is wrong because criticism does not remove the need for law. D is wrong because opposition debate has no power to close courts. Memory cue: constructive opposition acts like a check, not a roadblock.