What conclusion emerges by studying equality and anti-exploitation provisions together in Fundamental Rights?

Correct answer: The Constitution wants to protect civic dignity from social injustice too

Direct answer: B is correct. Equality provisions oppose unequal treatment, discrimination and practices that deny people equal status. Anti-exploitation provisions oppose practices such as trafficking, forced labour and hazardous employment of children. When these provisions are studied together, we see that the Constitution is concerned not only with political participation but also with the everyday social conditions in which people live. A person cannot enjoy meaningful freedom if poverty, caste-based humiliation, forced work or other forms of exploitation destroy personal dignity. A is wrong because constitutional rights are broader than political freedom. C is the opposite of the constitutional purpose: exploitation is prohibited, not accepted. D is wrong because constitutional protections also support minorities and other vulnerable groups. Memory cue: equality protects equal status; anti-exploitation protects people from degrading treatment and forced control.