If voters cannot vote due to violence in an area, why may ordering a re-poll be justified?

Correct answer: To restore voters' free participation

Violence can stop voters from reaching a polling station, entering it safely, or choosing freely without fear. In that situation, the original poll may not represent the genuine choice of the people in the affected area. A re-poll, ordered by the competent election authority under the applicable rules, gives eligible voters another opportunity to participate in a safer and freer environment. It is a remedy for a seriously disturbed electoral process.

The purpose of a re-poll is not to favour a particular candidate or to increase election expenses. Officials must assess the circumstances and follow the required legal procedure before ordering it. Option A is correct because it describes the restoration of voters' free participation and the fairness of the election. The other choices do not address the democratic harm caused by violence.