If rights are written in the constitution but can be permanently removed by an ordinary government order what is the problem?

Correct answer: Stable protection of constitutional rights will weaken

The direct answer is A: stable protection of constitutional rights would be weakened. Constitutional rights are meant to limit ordinary government power. Step by step: the constitution gives a right; ordinary authorities must respect it; any restriction must follow constitutional standards and lawful procedure; if one ordinary order can permanently erase the right, the constitutional promise becomes easily reversible. Option A is correct because it describes the loss of security and stability. Option B is wrong because easy removal makes rights less safe, not safer. Option C is wrong because such power makes government less limited, not more limited. Option D is wrong because bypassing constitutional protection does not automatically strengthen courts. Option C and D describe the opposite effect. Memory cue: an ordinary order cannot casually stand above the constitution.