If government says rights exist only in peace and no rights remain in crisis, what is the correct understanding?

Correct answer: Even in crisis balance of valid limits and basic protection is necessary

The direct answer is B: even in a crisis, valid limits must be balanced with basic protection. A serious emergency may require temporary restrictions for safety, but it does not automatically give the government unlimited power. Step by step: identify the danger; choose a lawful measure connected to that danger; ensure the measure is necessary and not excessive; keep basic protections and review by lawful institutions. Option A is wrong because a crisis does not automatically end all law. Option B is correct because security and rights must be balanced, and restrictions cannot become arbitrary. Option C is wrong because citizens may still ask questions and demand lawful reasons. Option D is wrong because rights are not gifts controlled by a ruler; they are protected by constitutional and legal principles. Memory cue: crisis may limit some rights, but it does not erase the rule of law.