If courts are independent but poor citizens cannot reach them due to cost, what question arises?

Correct answer: Question of real equal access to justice

The direct answer is B: the question of real equal access to justice. An independent court may be impartial, but independence alone does not guarantee justice for everyone. A poor citizen may have a legal right on paper yet be unable to hire a lawyer, travel to court, pay fees, or continue a long case. The reasoning is: the court is independent; the person needs legal help; cost blocks access; therefore formal equality exists, but practical equality is missing. Option A about an election symbol is unrelated to court access. Option B is correct because it asks whether all citizens can actually use the justice system. Option C about a polling booth concerns voting, not legal remedy. Option D about a campaign stage concerns elections and public meetings, not access to courts. Remember: equal justice means more than equal words in law; people must be able to reach and use the remedy.