If constitutional rights can be permanently removed by ordinary government order which concern is correct?

Correct answer: Constitutional supremacy and rights protection will weaken

Direct answer: Option A, constitutional supremacy and protection of rights would weaken. A constitution is the highest basic law. Ordinary government orders are lower rules, so they should follow constitutional rights and cannot permanently remove them at will. Step by step: constitutional rights are placed above ordinary administration; an ordinary order is easier for a government to change; if it could permanently cancel rights, rights would have no secure protection; therefore constitutional limits and the rule of law would be weakened. Option A is correct because constitutional supremacy means government power is limited by the constitution. Option B is wrong because an easily issued order would make rights less safe, not safer. Option C is wrong because the rule of law means rulers also obey established law; arbitrary removal of rights weakens it. Option D is wrong because courts remain important for interpreting the constitution and protecting rights. Governments may make lawful restrictions under constitutional procedures, but permanent removal by a simple order is the danger described. Memory cue: ordinary order must obey the constitution, never replace it.