If citizens' rights depend only on ordinary law and are not constitutionally protected, what danger exists?

Correct answer: The government or majority can easily change or weaken them

Direct answer: A is correct. An ordinary law is generally made or changed through the normal law-making process, so a government with sufficient political support may alter it more easily. Constitutional protection gives important rights a higher and more stable status and allows courts to examine laws that violate constitutional guarantees. The reasoning is: if a right exists only in an ordinary statute, a new majority may remove or narrow it; if it is constitutionally protected, public authorities must respect the constitutional limit. A therefore identifies the real danger. B is wrong because lack of constitutional protection does not strengthen a right automatically. C is too extreme and unrelated: ordinary legal protection does not mean the judiciary will always become inactive. D is also unrelated; elections do not immediately end merely because a right lacks constitutional status. Memory cue: ordinary law can change with ordinary politics; constitutional rights need stronger protection.