If citizens get rights but government is not responsible for protecting them what is the deficiency?

Correct answer: Lack of accountable protection of rights

The direct answer is A, Lack of accountable protection of rights. A right is meaningful only when public authorities respect it, protect it, and can be questioned when they fail. Follow the logic: citizens are granted rights; the government has a duty to prevent violations and provide remedies; if it accepts the rights on paper but refuses responsibility for protecting them, the protection is weak and unaccountable. Option A is correct because it identifies both the missing duty and the need for accountability. Option B, lack of election campaign, concerns political publicity and does not explain failure to protect rights. Option C, lack of a voting machine, is a technical election issue, not a general rights-protection issue. Option D, lack of voting age, is not a proper deficiency at all; voting age is a legal eligibility rule. In democracy, power must answer to citizens and institutions when rights are threatened. Memory cue: rights need responsible protection, not merely written promises.