If citizens cannot approach court against government, which democratic protection will end?

Legal remedy against government arbitrariness

The governing concept is access to justice and the constitutional remedy against arbitrary state action. Courts provide an independent forum where citizens can challenge unlawful orders, discrimination, detention or other abuses of public power. If access to court disappeared, people would lose an important legal remedy and government officials could act with far less accountability. Option A is correct because it names protection against government arbitrariness through lawful judicial relief. Option B concerns political campaigning, not court access. Option C is a structural matter about representation, and option D describes Rajya Sabha’s continuing character; neither is the democratic protection identified in the question.

This is a Class 9 Civics question. Chapter: Working of Institutions. Topic: The Judiciary (Supreme Court, High Courts, and judicial independence).