If a poor person cannot access justice in a democracy, what question arises from the significance of rights?

Correct answer: Whether rights are only written or also practically accessible

Direct answer: A is correct. A constitution may formally promise rights, but their democratic value also depends on whether ordinary people can actually use them. Poverty, lack of legal knowledge, distance, fear or the cost of proceedings may make access difficult. This raises the important question of implementation: are rights available in real life to the disadvantaged, or do they remain only written promises? Option B is irrelevant because the colour of polling stations does not measure access to justice. Option C is irrelevant because equal age among leaders is not the issue. Option D is wrong because a Constitution is a living framework for governing and protecting people, not merely a history book. Memory cue: written right plus real access equals effective right.