Update

Muft Shiksha™ एक 100% Free Education Portal है 🇮🇳, जिसका उद्देश्य Class 9–12 के हर विद्यार्थी तक High-Quality Education को पूरी तरह मुफ्त पहुँचाना है। 🇮🇳 हम मानते हैं कि अच्छी शिक्षा किसी student की आर्थिक स्थिति पर निर्भर नहीं होनी चाहिए। 🇮🇳 हर विद्यार्थी को वही Quality Study Material, MCQs, Quizzes, Exam Preparation, Concept-Based Learning और Bilingual Support मिलना चाहिए, जो आमतौर पर महंगी Coaching या Premium Platforms में मिलता है। Muft Shiksha™ 🇮🇳 इसी सोच के साथ बनाया गया है

Subjects
0 reads0 ratings0 helpful

How does imposing spending limits on money power increase electoral equality?

Answer and explanation

Correct answer: It limits unfair influence of wealthy candidates

Answer: A. Campaigning requires communication with voters, but unlimited spending can allow a wealthy candidate to buy much more publicity, transport, advertising, or organisational support than others. A spending limit does not make every candidate equally rich and does not guarantee the same number of votes. Instead, it places a legal boundary on campaign expenditure so that money has less power to distort competition. B is wrong because a spending limit concerns candidates’ campaign expenses, not the voting rights of poor citizens. C is wrong because votes are cast by voters and are not distributed by the spending rule. D is wrong because counting still has to take place after polling. The key idea is fair opportunity to compete, not identical wealth or identical votes. Memory cue: expenditure limit reduces money’s unfair advantage.

Related tags

Money PowerExpenditure LimitFair CompetitionElectoral EqualityWhat Makes Elections In India Free And Fair?What Makes Elections In India Free And FairElectoral PoliticsCivics

Was this question useful?

No ratings yetWrite a review / Rate this question

Student Reviews

No published reviews yet.

Add Muft Shiksha to your Home Screen

In Safari, tap Share, then Add to Home Screen.