Question 1

If decisions in democracy are slow but taken after wide discussion what is the most balanced conclusion?

Accepted Answer

Slow process is a weakness but discussion can improve decision quality Democracy may take time but deliberation can make decisions more balanced. In exams write both benefit and criticism.

Question 2

The argument that people can change the government in democracy answers which criticism?

Accepted Answer

Possibility of choosing a wrong government If a wrong government is chosen people can change it next time. In exams write corrective capacity as a strength of democracy.

Question 3

Influence of money power in democracy can weaken which basic democratic value?

Accepted Answer

Political equality Money power can make rich candidates or groups more influential. In exams connect money power with criticism of democracy.

Question 4

If leaders in democracy make promises only to win elections and later forget them which criticism is correct?

Accepted Answer

Politics can become a tool to gain power Electoral politics can sometimes become power-centred. In exams remember the relation between promises and accountability.

Question 5

Why are debate and criticism considered tools for improving decisions in democracy?

Accepted Answer

They bring out mistakes and alternative views Debate shows weaknesses and alternatives in decisions. In exams connect criticism with democracy's corrective capacity.

Question 6

If rule continues without people's consent which argument in favour of democracy will weaken?

Accepted Answer

Democratic legitimacy The correct answer is B: democratic legitimacy. Legitimacy means that people regard a government’s authority as rightful and acceptable. In a democracy, that authority is connected to the people’s consent. Reasoning step by step: citizens participate and express approval through democratic procedures; representatives receive power from that public choice; without consent, rule may continue by force or habit, but its democratic basis becomes weak; therefore democratic legitimacy is the argument weakened by rule without consent. Option A is wrong because corruption may become more likely or less likely, but the question is about the basis of rightful authority. Option B is correct because legitimacy directly depends on public consent. Option C is wrong because slow decision-making concerns speed, not the source of authority. Option D is wrong because leader expertise does not itself create popular approval. Exam cue: consent is the foundation of legitimacy.

Question 7

The argument that ordinary voters may not fully understand every complex policy belongs to which category?

Accepted Answer

Criticism against democracy This is a criticism related to voters' knowledge. In exams identify it as a limitation of democracy.

Question 8

The argument of citizen dignity in democracy is based on which idea?

Accepted Answer

Every citizen's voice and vote are respected Democracy treats citizens not merely as subjects but as participants. In exams connect dignity with participation.

Question 9

If a democratic government changes policy after listening to criticism which aspect becomes stronger?

Accepted Answer

Capacity for correction and accountability The direct answer is A: capacity for correction and accountability. A democratic government is expected to listen to criticism, explain its actions and correct policies when evidence shows that a decision is harmful or ineffective. The fact chain is: citizens criticise a policy; the government hears the criticism; it reviews the policy; it changes or improves it; it becomes answerable for its results. Option A is correct because this process shows both correction and accountability. Option B, hereditary rule, means power passes through a family and has nothing to do with responding to criticism. Option C, secret administration, suggests decisions are hidden from citizens, which reduces accountability. Option D, citizens' silence, is the opposite of criticism and participation. Criticism does not automatically mean every demand must be accepted, but it gives government information and pressure to improve. Exam cue: criticism that leads to review shows a democratic strength.

Question 10

When will electoral competition in democracy be considered positive?

Accepted Answer

When it forces leaders to focus on people's needs Healthy competition makes leaders responsive to people. In exams remember both sides of competition.

Question 11

When does electoral competition in democracy become negative?

Accepted Answer

When it becomes a race for power instead of public service Race for power can become a criticism of democratic politics. In exams write the difference between public service and power race.

Question 12

If misinformation influences voters in democracy which challenge arises?

Accepted Answer

Voters' decision may be misled Misinformation can affect voters' choices. In exams understand quality of information as a challenge of democracy.

Question 13

Why is deliberation valued in democracy despite slow process?

Accepted Answer

Because it can make decisions more acceptable and responsible Deliberation considers more interests in a decision. In exams write the balance between delay and acceptability.

Question 14

Peaceful resolution of differences in democracy shows which major benefit?

Accepted Answer

Conflicts in society can reduce through dialogue Democracy directs differences toward dialogue rather than violence. In exams write conflict resolution as a benefit.

Question 15

If leaders ignore people's needs in democracy which accountability mechanism can control them?

Accepted Answer

People's decision in the next election Elections force leaders to pay attention to people's needs. In exams remember electoral accountability.

Question 16

The emotional public opinion argument against democracy is linked with which concern?

Accepted Answer

Public opinion may sometimes be influenced by emotion instead of reason Public opinion may sometimes be influenced by emotions or misinformation. In exams write it as a challenge of democracy.

Question 17

How does public debate examine decisions in democracy?

Accepted Answer

By bringing out weaknesses and alternatives of a decision Public debate helps identify mistakes and alternatives. In exams connect debate with decision quality.

Question 18

If policy decision in democracy is made after consulting many groups which benefit is seen?

Accepted Answer

More inclusive decision Hearing many groups can make a decision more inclusive. In exams write inclusiveness as a benefit of democracy.

Question 19

If elections are affected by corruption which feature of democracy may weaken?

Accepted Answer

Fair representation Corruption weakens electoral fairness and representation. In exams treat corruption as a serious criticism.

Question 20

The argument that government is accountable to people in democracy is most strengthened by what?

Accepted Answer

People's right to choose and change government The right to change government is the basis of democratic accountability. In exams write change of government and accountability together.

Question 21

How is the human dignity argument in democracy different from dictatorship?

Accepted Answer

Democracy treats citizens as participants while dictatorship may treat them as order followers Democracy values citizens' voice and participation. In exams connect dignity with participation.

Question 22

If someone says not everyone is expert in democracy so democracy is wrong what is the balanced answer?

Accepted Answer

There is a limitation of expertise but discussion and accountability improve democracy Lack of expertise is a challenge but democracy also has correction mechanisms. In exams give a balanced answer.

Question 23

Opposition criticism in democracy can be linked with which benefit?

Accepted Answer

Watch over government and accountability The direct answer is A: watch over the government and accountability. In a democracy, the opposition is not merely a group that disagrees; it examines government actions, asks questions, points out mistakes, and presents alternative policies. Step by step: the ruling party makes decisions; the opposition studies those decisions; it brings problems before the legislature and the public; public discussion and questioning pressure the government to explain and correct its work. Thus opposition criticism helps keep power responsible. Option A is correct because monitoring and accountability are important democratic benefits. Option B is wrong because opposition criticism does not end elections; opposition parties normally compete in elections. Option C is wrong because criticism helps protect, not end, citizens’ rights. Option D is wrong because opposition activity gives people more political involvement rather than removing them. Remember: opposition means a democratic check on government, not an enemy of democracy.

Question 24

What can be a criticism related to coalition government in democracy?

Accepted Answer

Compromises and delays in policy decisions may increase In coalition many parties' agreement can slow decisions. In exams connect it with criticism of decision process.

Question 25

If citizens in democracy are limited only to voting and no discussion occurs which aspect weakens?

Accepted Answer

Public deliberation and active participation Democracy is not only voting but also discussion and participation. In exams write broader citizen role.

Arguments for and against democracy

Practice questions

01 If decisions in democracy are slow but taken after wide discussion what is the most balanced conclusion?

02 The argument that people can change the government in democracy answers which criticism?

03 Influence of money power in democracy can weaken which basic democratic value?

04 If leaders in democracy make promises only to win elections and later forget them which criticism is correct?

05 Why are debate and criticism considered tools for improving decisions in democracy?

06 If rule continues without people's consent which argument in favour of democracy will weaken?

07 The argument that ordinary voters may not fully understand every complex policy belongs to which category?

08 The argument of citizen dignity in democracy is based on which idea?

09 If a democratic government changes policy after listening to criticism which aspect becomes stronger?

10 When will electoral competition in democracy be considered positive?

11 When does electoral competition in democracy become negative?

12 If misinformation influences voters in democracy which challenge arises?

13 Why is deliberation valued in democracy despite slow process?

14 Peaceful resolution of differences in democracy shows which major benefit?

15 If leaders ignore people's needs in democracy which accountability mechanism can control them?

16 The emotional public opinion argument against democracy is linked with which concern?

17 How does public debate examine decisions in democracy?

18 If policy decision in democracy is made after consulting many groups which benefit is seen?

19 If elections are affected by corruption which feature of democracy may weaken?

20 The argument that government is accountable to people in democracy is most strengthened by what?

21 How is the human dignity argument in democracy different from dictatorship?

22 If someone says not everyone is expert in democracy so democracy is wrong what is the balanced answer?

23 Opposition criticism in democracy can be linked with which benefit?

24 What can be a criticism related to coalition government in democracy?

25 If citizens in democracy are limited only to voting and no discussion occurs which aspect weakens?

Was this question useful?

Student Reviews

Add Muft Shiksha to your Home Screen