Question 1

Getting rights and participation in democracy strengthens which argument?

Accepted Answer

Democracy enhances citizens' dignity Rights and participation strengthen citizens' dignity. In exams write it in favour of democracy.

Question 2

In democracy taking people's opinion may slow decisions but what benefit can it give?

Accepted Answer

Decision can become more acceptable Consultation can give decisions more social acceptance. In exams view delay and acceptability in balance.

Question 3

If accountability is absent in democracy which aspect will weaken?

Accepted Answer

Governance responsible to people Accountability is a major benefit of democratic governance. In exams write responsible government as a pro-democracy argument.

Question 4

Why is it argued against democracy that politics can become a game of professional interests?

Accepted Answer

Because competition for power and office can increase Competition for power and office can become a criticism of democracy. In exams write it as the negative side of political competition.

Question 5

What is considered the basis of legitimacy of governance in democracy?

Accepted Answer

People's consent and participation Direct answer: Option A, people's consent and participation. Legitimacy means that people accept a government as having the right to rule. In a democracy, this acceptance comes from citizens' consent, usually expressed through free and fair elections, public participation, constitutional rules, and accountable institutions. Option A is correct because democratic authority is based on the will and involvement of the people. Option B is wrong because family descent alone does not show present public consent. Option C is wrong because military control uses force rather than democratic approval. Option D is wrong because secret orders do not provide transparency, participation, or public authorization. Consent does not mean every person agrees with every decision; it means government follows accepted democratic procedures. Memory cue: legitimacy comes from people, not inheritance, force, or secrecy.

Question 6

In criticism of democracy how is the limitation of ordinary voters described?

Accepted Answer

They may not be experts in every complex policy The criticism is that ordinary voters may not have expert understanding of every issue. In exams write it as a limitation.

Question 7

Handling disagreement through dialogue in democracy shows which democratic capacity?

Accepted Answer

Capacity to resolve conflicts peacefully Dialogue helps democracy find peaceful solutions to conflicts. In exams write dialogue and agreement together.

Question 8

People can change government in democracy is also an answer to which criticism?

Accepted Answer

Possibility of choosing a wrong government If a wrong government is chosen people can change it in the next election. In exams write ability to correct as a strength.

Question 9

Why is it necessary to understand both for and against democracy?

Accepted Answer

So democracy can be evaluated in a balanced way Understanding both benefits and limits makes the answer balanced. In exams prepare both for and against points.

Question 10

When can electoral competition in democracy be considered positive?

Accepted Answer

When it forces leaders to focus on people's needs Competition can make leaders responsive to people. In exams remember both positive and negative sides of competition.

Question 11

When can electoral competition in democracy be considered negative?

Accepted Answer

When it becomes only a race for power instead of public service Race for power can be a negative side of democratic politics. In exams understand the difference between public service and power race.

Question 12

Discussing differences instead of suppressing them in democracy strengthens which argument?

Accepted Answer

Democracy gives peaceful solutions Discussion helps handle differences peacefully. In exams write it as an argument in favour of democracy.

Question 13

Freedom to criticize government in democracy is linked with which benefit?

Accepted Answer

Accountability and transparency Freedom to criticize makes government accountable. In exams treat criticism as a healthy feature of democracy.

Question 14

Why is it important to hear many sides before decision-making in democracy?

Accepted Answer

So interests of more people are considered in the decision Hearing many sides can make a decision more inclusive. In exams write inclusive decision-making as a benefit of democracy.

Question 15

What does the argument against democracy related to false propaganda say?

Accepted Answer

Voters can be influenced by misinformation Misinformation can affect voters' decisions. In exams understand false propaganda as a challenge of democracy.

Question 16

Which aspect of democracy makes a citizen not merely governed but a participant?

Accepted Answer

Participation in voting and public discussion Voting and discussion make citizens participants in governance. In exams connect citizen participation with dignity.

Question 17

What is the importance of public debate on decisions in democracy?

Accepted Answer

It helps examine and improve decisions Public debate can bring out weaknesses in decisions. In exams connect debate with decision quality.

Question 18

Despite corruption criticism in democracy what is its corrective aspect?

Accepted Answer

People can remove corrupt leaders in elections Democracy gives people a chance to change wrong leaders. In exams remember both criticism and corrective ability.

Question 19

The human dignity argument in favour of democracy is linked with which idea?

Accepted Answer

Every citizen’s voice and vote should receive equal importance The human dignity argument is based on the principle that every citizen deserves respect and equal political importance. Therefore, democracy gives adult citizens the opportunity to vote and participate in public decisions. Option B gives decisive importance only to a limited group, which goes against equal dignity. Exam tip: Connect human dignity with ‘one person, one vote’ and equal respect for citizens.

Question 20

How can the criticism of slow decisions and the argument of better decisions in democracy be linked?

Accepted Answer

Slow discussion takes time but can improve decisions Democracy's slow process is a criticism and also a chance for thoughtful decisions. In exams give a balanced answer.

Question 21

What effect can fear of electoral defeat have on leaders in democracy?

Accepted Answer

They may pay more attention to people's needs Fear of electoral defeat can make leaders accountable to people. In exams connect elections with accountability.

Question 22

The argument against democracy that decisions can be emotional can be balanced by what?

Accepted Answer

By open discussion and informed debate Open discussion can make emotional decisions more reasoned. In exams write debate as a corrective element.

Question 23

What can be said in a balanced conclusion about arguments for and against democracy?

Accepted Answer

Democracy has shortcomings but accountability dignity and corrective capacity make it better Democracy is not perfect but its corrective and accountable qualities are important. In exams write a balanced conclusion.

Question 24

Why is decision making after discussion considered an advantage in democracy?

Accepted Answer

It can improve decisions through different views Discussion brings out mistakes and new suggestions. Exam tip: connect discussion with quality of decision.

Question 25

In democracy government accountability mainly comes from what?

Accepted Answer

From people's power to choose and change government Elections and public criticism make government accountable. Exam tip: remember elections and accountability together.

Arguments for and against democracy

Practice questions

01 Getting rights and participation in democracy strengthens which argument?

02 In democracy taking people's opinion may slow decisions but what benefit can it give?

03 If accountability is absent in democracy which aspect will weaken?

04 Why is it argued against democracy that politics can become a game of professional interests?

05 What is considered the basis of legitimacy of governance in democracy?

06 In criticism of democracy how is the limitation of ordinary voters described?

07 Handling disagreement through dialogue in democracy shows which democratic capacity?

08 People can change government in democracy is also an answer to which criticism?

09 Why is it necessary to understand both for and against democracy?

10 When can electoral competition in democracy be considered positive?

11 When can electoral competition in democracy be considered negative?

12 Discussing differences instead of suppressing them in democracy strengthens which argument?

13 Freedom to criticize government in democracy is linked with which benefit?

14 Why is it important to hear many sides before decision-making in democracy?

15 What does the argument against democracy related to false propaganda say?

16 Which aspect of democracy makes a citizen not merely governed but a participant?

17 What is the importance of public debate on decisions in democracy?

18 Despite corruption criticism in democracy what is its corrective aspect?

19 The human dignity argument in favour of democracy is linked with which idea?

20 How can the criticism of slow decisions and the argument of better decisions in democracy be linked?

21 What effect can fear of electoral defeat have on leaders in democracy?

22 The argument against democracy that decisions can be emotional can be balanced by what?

23 What can be said in a balanced conclusion about arguments for and against democracy?

24 Why is decision making after discussion considered an advantage in democracy?

25 In democracy government accountability mainly comes from what?

Was this question useful?

Student Reviews

Add Muft Shiksha to your Home Screen