Question 1

Through what does an ordinary citizen get a chance to take part in forming government in democracy?

Accepted Answer

Through voting and political participation Voting makes ordinary citizens participants in forming government. Exam tip: treat citizen participation as an advantage.

Question 2

What does the party conflict argument in criticism of democracy suggest?

Accepted Answer

Party competition may increase tension Direct answer: Option B, party competition may increase tension. Political parties offer different programmes and compete for public support. This competition is useful because it gives voters choices and allows governments to be challenged, but it can also become aggressive, create social divisions, or produce conflict when parties place victory above public interest. That possible harmful effect is the criticism described in the question. Option A is wrong because parties do not always unite society; they may cooperate, but competition can also divide people. Option B is correct because it states the possible negative consequence without claiming that it always happens. Option C is wrong because parties do not stop elections; in a democracy, parties usually contest elections and help voters compare choices. Option D is too extreme and incorrect: party debate does not automatically end citizen rights, and open debate can actually help protect rights. The careful word is “may,” meaning a possibility, not a certainty. Memory cue: party competition gives choice, but excessive rivalry can create tension.

Question 3

How does open debate help citizens in democracy?

Accepted Answer

It helps them understand issues and ask questions Open debate increases citizen awareness and accountability. Exam tip: connect debate not only with delay but also awareness.

Question 4

Which example explains the argument of possibility of correction in favour of democracy?

Accepted Answer

People replace a bad government in the next election In democracy people can learn from a mistake and choose a new option. Exam tip: see next election as a chance for correction.

Question 5

Which weakness of democracy appears when compared with a system of instant decisions?

Accepted Answer

Delay in decisions Democratic discussion can slow decisions. Exam tip: understand the difference between instant decisions and democratic discussion.

Question 6

What is the practical meaning of enhanced citizen dignity in democracy?

Accepted Answer

A citizen can express views and their vote has value Dignity means citizen's voice and political importance. Exam tip: remember dignity with practical examples.

Question 7

If a lot is spent on election campaigns in democracy how can it be viewed?

Accepted Answer

Possible weakness of democracy The direct answer is C, a possible weakness of democracy. Large election spending can create problems when money power gives wealthy candidates or groups an unfair advantage. Step by step: campaigns require money for travel, publicity and organisation; very high spending may make political competition unequal; candidates may depend on wealthy donors; policies may then be influenced by money rather than public welfare. Option A is wrong because excessive spending is not itself a moral advantage. Option B is wrong because campaign cost does not directly mean that the decision made is high quality. Option C is correct because money power and expensive campaigns are commonly discussed as possible weaknesses or challenges. Option D is wrong because peaceful transfer of power is a democratic advantage, but it is not what excessive campaign spending describes. Do not assume every campaign expense is unlawful; the question asks how excessive spending may be viewed. Memory cue: unfair money power is a criticism, not a benefit.

Question 8

What increases responsibility toward people in democracy?

Accepted Answer

Possibility of losing elections Possibility of losing elections forces government to care about people's needs. Exam tip: remember electoral accountability.

Question 9

Why is listening to voices of different social groups useful in democracy?

Accepted Answer

Policies can become more inclusive Diverse voices help policy consider different needs. Exam tip: understand inclusion as an advantage of democracy.

Question 10

The argument of incompetent leadership against democracy is based on what?

Accepted Answer

Sometimes a popular person may not be competent Critics say winning elections is not always proof of competence. Exam tip: understand difference between popularity and competence.

Question 11

Why is public debate necessary for policy correction in democracy?

Accepted Answer

It brings mistakes and alternative suggestions forward The direct answer is A: public debate brings mistakes and alternative suggestions forward. Policy means a government’s planned course of action. Even a policy made with good intentions may have weaknesses or may affect different groups differently. Step by step: the policy is presented; citizens, experts, opposition groups and affected communities discuss it; problems and unintended effects become visible; alternative suggestions are compared; the policy can then be changed or improved. Option A is correct because debate supplies criticism and possible solutions for correction. Option B is wrong because debate does not end every question; it often creates clearer questions. Option C is wrong because public debate brings public opinion into the open. Option D is wrong because debate does not stop elections; it can help voters judge parties and policies. Memory cue: open discussion reveals errors before they become bigger.

Question 12

When can majority based decision making in democracy be considered incomplete?

Accepted Answer

When minority rights are ignored In democracy respect for rights is necessary along with majority. Exam tip: remember balance between majority and rights.

Question 13

What is the relation between people's participation and dignity in favour of democracy?

Accepted Answer

Participation makes citizens respected decision makers The direct answer is A: participation makes citizens respected decision-makers. Dignity means the feeling that a person has equal worth and deserves respect. Democratic participation gives citizens a real place in public life. Step by step: citizens express needs and opinions; they vote, attend meetings, discuss issues or contact representatives; decision-makers must consider these voices; citizens are treated as people capable of judging and contributing to government. This recognition strengthens dignity. Option A is correct because participation gives citizens respect and political agency. Option B is wrong because genuine participation allows citizens to speak rather than silencing them. Option C is wrong because participation brings people into governance instead of excluding them. Option D is wrong because participation supports elections and makes them meaningful; it does not end them. Memory cue: having a voice is a sign of dignity in democracy.

Question 14

What does the populist promises argument in criticism of democracy say?

Accepted Answer

Leaders may make unrealistic promises to get votes Unrealistic promises for electoral gain can be a criticism of democracy. Exam tip: place populism under arguments against democracy.

Question 15

What is the benefit when decisions are linked with people's consent in democracy?

Accepted Answer

Legitimacy of decisions increases In a democracy, public consent means that people accept the authority of the government and the decisions made through recognised democratic procedures. Consent does not mean that every citizen agrees with every individual policy. It means that citizens have a meaningful connection with the decision-making process, directly or through elected representatives. This public acceptance makes government authority more legitimate and easier to justify.

Option A is correct because decisions linked with people's consent gain legitimacy. The other choices describe the opposite of democracy: ending the people's role, making government secret, or removing rights. A decision may still be criticised or challenged even when it is legitimate. Legitimacy therefore comes from lawful, representative, and accountable decision-making, not simply from the fact that the government can issue an order.

Question 16

The argument that elections may create polarisation in society is linked to what against democracy?

Accepted Answer

Negative side of electoral competition Sometimes electoral competition can increase distance between groups. Exam tip: place polarisation under criticism.

Question 17

What sense does the ability to change power give people in democracy?

Accepted Answer

They are owners and participants of governance Power to change government gives people real political importance. Exam tip: remember people's power.

Question 18

Why is democracy preferred despite its weaknesses?

Accepted Answer

Because it gives citizens participation accountability and dignity Democracy has weaknesses but its core benefits are very important. Exam tip: write a balanced conclusion.

Question 19

What is the correct method while studying arguments for and against democracy?

Accepted Answer

Identify advantages and weaknesses separately In this topic positive and negative arguments should be understood separately. Exam tip: categorisation makes answers clear.

Question 20

Why is rule without people's consent considered weak in democracy?

Accepted Answer

Because democracy is based on people's will In democracy power is based on people's consent. Exam tip: connect people's will with legitimacy.

Question 21

What is the most balanced evaluation of argument and debate in democracy?

Accepted Answer

They can slow decisions but improve quality Direct answer: Option A, debate can slow decisions but improve their quality. Democratic debate has two sides. First, listening to different opinions, examining evidence, and consulting affected people may take time. Second, this process can reveal mistakes, include more interests, and produce a better-considered decision. Option A is correct because it recognises both the possible cost and the important benefit. Option B is wrong because debate does not always cause only harm; it can improve fairness and accuracy. Option C is wrong because debate gives citizens opportunities to speak rather than silencing them. Option D is wrong because elections and debate can exist together; discussion does not make elections impossible. A balanced answer avoids praising or condemning democracy in an absolute way. Memory cue: debate may reduce speed, but it can increase care, consent, and quality.

Question 22

Which is the most correct medium level conclusion about democracy?

Accepted Answer

Democracy has weaknesses yet gives accountable dignified and correctable government Democracy should be evaluated through both advantages and weaknesses. Exam tip: a balanced conclusion is best.

Question 23

Why is the ability to listen to criticism considered an argument in favour of democracy?

Accepted Answer

It gives government a chance to correct its mistakes Listening to criticism can help government improve its policies. In exams connect criticism with democracy's corrective capacity.

Question 24

The argument against democracy about lack of quick decisions can be balanced by what?

Accepted Answer

Deliberation can create more acceptable and responsible decisions Decisions in democracy can be slow but discussion can make them more acceptable. In exams write both criticism and benefit.

Question 25

If people participate in the decision making process in democracy why does government legitimacy increase?

Accepted Answer

Because decisions are linked with people's consent and participation People's participation makes governance more acceptable and legitimate. Exam tip: remember consent and legitimacy together.

Arguments for and against democracy

Practice questions

01 Through what does an ordinary citizen get a chance to take part in forming government in democracy?

02 What does the party conflict argument in criticism of democracy suggest?

03 How does open debate help citizens in democracy?

04 Which example explains the argument of possibility of correction in favour of democracy?

05 Which weakness of democracy appears when compared with a system of instant decisions?

06 What is the practical meaning of enhanced citizen dignity in democracy?

07 If a lot is spent on election campaigns in democracy how can it be viewed?

08 What increases responsibility toward people in democracy?

09 Why is listening to voices of different social groups useful in democracy?

10 The argument of incompetent leadership against democracy is based on what?

11 Why is public debate necessary for policy correction in democracy?

12 When can majority based decision making in democracy be considered incomplete?

13 What is the relation between people's participation and dignity in favour of democracy?

14 What does the populist promises argument in criticism of democracy say?

15 What is the benefit when decisions are linked with people's consent in democracy?

16 The argument that elections may create polarisation in society is linked to what against democracy?

17 What sense does the ability to change power give people in democracy?

18 Why is democracy preferred despite its weaknesses?

19 What is the correct method while studying arguments for and against democracy?

20 Why is rule without people's consent considered weak in democracy?

21 What is the most balanced evaluation of argument and debate in democracy?

22 Which is the most correct medium level conclusion about democracy?

23 Why is the ability to listen to criticism considered an argument in favour of democracy?

24 The argument against democracy about lack of quick decisions can be balanced by what?

25 If people participate in the decision making process in democracy why does government legitimacy increase?

Was this question useful?

Student Reviews

Add Muft Shiksha to your Home Screen