Question 1

If the government cannot escape public criticism in a democracy, which pro-democracy argument becomes stronger?

Accepted Answer

Accountable government In democracy, government remains answerable to people's questions and votes. Exam tip: connect criticism with accountability.

Question 2

In democracy, decisions may be slow because many people are consulted. What type of argument is this?

Accepted Answer

Argument against democracy Delay in decisions is a common criticism of democracy. Exam tip: place slow process under arguments against democracy.

Question 3

How can discussion improve the quality of decisions in democracy?

Accepted Answer

Different sides get attention Discussion includes many viewpoints in a decision. Exam tip: connect better decisions with consultation.

Question 4

If people can change a wrong government in elections, which benefit of democracy is shown?

Accepted Answer

Ability to correct mistakes Democracy gives people a chance to correct mistakes by changing government. Exam tip: remember elections as a tool of correction.

Question 5

Giving importance to every citizen's voice in democracy is linked with which argument?

Accepted Answer

Dignity of the individual increases Democracy treats citizens as respected participants. Exam tip: connect dignity with equality and participation.

Question 6

Frequent change of leaders may make government unstable. This is an example of which argument?

Accepted Answer

Criticism of democracy Instability is an argument given against democracy. Exam tip: connect change of leaders with criticism.

Question 7

Why is democracy considered useful in handling differences?

Accepted Answer

It gives a path of dialogue and compromise Democracy tries to resolve differences through peaceful discussion. Exam tip: treat dialogue as a merit of democracy.

Question 8

If electoral competition becomes a race for power, which criticism applies?

Accepted Answer

Morality in politics may decline Race for power is counted as a criticism of democracy. Exam tip: connect political competition with arguments against democracy.

Question 9

On what is the accountability argument in favour of democracy based?

Accepted Answer

People can choose and change government The direct answer is A: people can choose and change the government. Accountability means that rulers must remain responsible to those who gave them authority. In a democracy, regular, free and fair elections provide this control. Step by step: citizens choose representatives; the government exercises power for a period; citizens observe its performance and can ask questions; in the next election they may re-elect it or replace it. The possibility of losing office encourages leaders to respond to public needs and explain their decisions. Option A is correct because the power to choose and change rulers makes government answerable to citizens. Option B is wrong because democratic citizens have the right to vote. Option C is wrong because governments can change through elections or other constitutional processes. Option D is wrong because questioning is an important part of accountability. Memory cue: voters can reward or remove rulers.

Question 10

Some people say ordinary citizens do not always understand their interests correctly. This belongs to which category?

Accepted Answer

Against democracy This is an argument made by critics of democracy. Exam tip: place the ordinary citizens ability argument against democracy.

Question 11

Which statement is correct in favour of better decisions in democracy?

Accepted Answer

Debate can reduce the possibility of mistakes The direct answer is A, because debate can reduce the possibility of mistakes. Democracy gives decisions a chance to be examined by more than one mind. Step by step: a proposal is presented; people ask questions and provide facts; supporters and critics discuss its likely effects; weaknesses or errors may be noticed before implementation; the decision can then be revised or improved. Option A is correct, although debate does not guarantee that no mistake will occur. Option B is wrong because one person does not always have the best knowledge and may act arbitrarily. Option C is wrong because public opinion can provide important experience and a check on power. Option D is wrong because decisions without information are more likely to be poor. Debate is useful when it is informed and respectful. Memory cue: discussion checks decisions before they become actions.

Question 12

The argument about the possibility of corruption in democracy is most related to what?

Accepted Answer

Election expenses and race for power Critics say money and race for power in electoral politics may increase corruption. Exam tip: keep corruption as an argument against democracy.

Question 13

Citizen participation in democracy strengthens which argument?

Accepted Answer

People become connected with governance Democracy makes people participants in governance. Exam tip: treat participation as an argument in favour of democracy.

Question 14

Why can competition among many parties and leaders be seen as an argument against democracy?

Accepted Answer

Because it may increase power struggle and immorality Political competition can sometimes become a power struggle. Exam tip: place power struggle under criticism of democracy.

Question 15

Why is democracy said to enhance dignity?

Accepted Answer

Because it gives every citizen equal political importance and the right to express their views Democracy gives every adult citizen equal political status. Citizens can vote, express their views, and influence public decisions. This equal respect and voice enhance individual dignity. Option B describes power concentrated in one ruler or a small group, which is contrary to democratic principles. Exam tip: connect dignity in democracy with equality, rights, and participation.

Question 16

If decisions in democracy take time due to debate, how should it be understood?

Accepted Answer

As both a merit and a criticism Debate can improve decisions but also takes time. Exam tip: identify two sides of the same point.

Question 17

Peaceful change of power in democracy is linked with which pro-democracy argument?

Accepted Answer

People can correct mistakes Power can change through elections and mistakes can be corrected. Exam tip: treat peaceful change as a strength of democracy.

Question 18

Which example shows peaceful resolution of differences in democracy?

Accepted Answer

Parties discuss and vote together Discussion and voting handle differences peacefully. Exam tip: connect dialogue with resolution.

Question 19

In which situation will the instability argument against democracy be clearer?

Accepted Answer

When governments change very often Frequent change of government can strengthen the criticism of instability. Exam tip: keep instability as an argument against democracy.

Question 20

Which pro-democracy argument is most related to citizens' rights?

Accepted Answer

Dignity and participation of the individual Direct answer: Option B, the dignity and participation of the individual, is most closely related to citizens’ rights. Democracy treats each citizen as an equal person whose voice has value. Rights protect dignity, while participation allows people to influence decisions through voting, discussion and representation. Step by step: every citizen has equal worth; rights protect freedom and respect; participation gives citizens a voice; therefore dignity and participation directly express the rights-based reason for democracy. Option A is wrong because delay in decisions is generally presented as a possible weakness, not a citizen-rights benefit. Option B is correct because it combines respect for the person with an active role in public life. Option C is wrong because instability of leaders is a possible criticism, not a rights-based advantage. Option D is wrong because electoral corruption is a danger or criticism that can violate equal political opportunity. Democracy may be imperfect, but it gives citizens status, voice and peaceful means to demand respect. Memory cue: rights give dignity; participation gives voice.

Question 21

If elected leaders can also make wrong decisions, this is linked with which criticism?

Accepted Answer

Decision-making ability of elected leaders may be limited Critics of democracy say elected leaders can also be wrong. Exam tip: understand it as an argument against democracy.

Question 22

How does public opinion affect government in democracy?

Accepted Answer

It keeps government accountable and alert The direct answer is B, public opinion keeps the government accountable and alert. In democracy, government is expected to listen to citizens because citizens can criticise policies, influence public debate and change representatives through elections. Step by step: people form opinions about an issue; newspapers, media, meetings and citizens communicate those views; the government notices public support or opposition; it may explain, modify or withdraw a policy. Option A is wrong because public opinion connects government with people rather than separating them. Option B is correct because public pressure encourages responsiveness and accountability. Option C is wrong because public opinion does not end elections; it helps voters judge candidates. Option D is wrong because public opinion supports discussion of rights rather than removing them. Public opinion is not always perfectly informed, but in a democracy it is an important check on power. Exam cue: public opinion makes rulers answerable to citizens.

Question 23

Why can the slow process of democracy sometimes be considered a benefit?

Accepted Answer

Because more thinking happens before decision Slow process can result from discussion and caution. Exam tip: see decision quality along with delay.

Question 24

Which option correctly separates an argument against and an argument for democracy?

Accepted Answer

Delay against and accountability in favour The correct answer is A: delay is an argument against democracy, while accountability is an argument in favour of it. To classify the pair, first ask whether the statement describes a difficulty or a benefit. Democratic decisions may take time because consultation and disagreement are allowed; this is a criticism. Democratic government must explain its actions and can be questioned or removed by citizens; this is a merit. Option A puts both ideas in their correct categories. Option B is wrong because dignity is a democratic benefit, while corruption is not a benefit. Option C is wrong because correcting mistakes is a benefit, while instability is a possible criticism. Option D is wrong because participation is a benefit, while power struggle is generally a difficulty, not a democratic merit. Exam method: label each phrase separately before judging the whole option.

Question 25

What does the ability to change government give people in democracy?

Accepted Answer

A means of control over government Direct answer: Option A, a means of control over government. In a democracy, people do not surrender all power after an election. They can judge the government's work, question it, criticize it, use public discussion, and vote it out at the next election. This possibility makes rulers answerable and gives citizens indirect control over public power. Option A is correct because the ability to change government is a practical democratic check. Option B is wrong because citizens are not required to remain silent. Option C is wrong because changing governments through elections opposes hereditary power, where office passes through a family. Option D is wrong because democratic change protects the possibility of rights rather than ending them. Memory cue: if rulers can be peacefully replaced, they must listen.

Arguments for and against democracy

Practice questions

01 If the government cannot escape public criticism in a democracy, which pro-democracy argument becomes stronger?

02 In democracy, decisions may be slow because many people are consulted. What type of argument is this?

03 How can discussion improve the quality of decisions in democracy?

04 If people can change a wrong government in elections, which benefit of democracy is shown?

05 Giving importance to every citizen's voice in democracy is linked with which argument?

06 Frequent change of leaders may make government unstable. This is an example of which argument?

07 Why is democracy considered useful in handling differences?

08 If electoral competition becomes a race for power, which criticism applies?

09 On what is the accountability argument in favour of democracy based?

10 Some people say ordinary citizens do not always understand their interests correctly. This belongs to which category?

11 Which statement is correct in favour of better decisions in democracy?

12 The argument about the possibility of corruption in democracy is most related to what?

13 Citizen participation in democracy strengthens which argument?

14 Why can competition among many parties and leaders be seen as an argument against democracy?

15 Why is democracy said to enhance dignity?

16 If decisions in democracy take time due to debate, how should it be understood?

17 Peaceful change of power in democracy is linked with which pro-democracy argument?

18 Which example shows peaceful resolution of differences in democracy?

19 In which situation will the instability argument against democracy be clearer?

20 Which pro-democracy argument is most related to citizens' rights?

21 If elected leaders can also make wrong decisions, this is linked with which criticism?

22 How does public opinion affect government in democracy?

23 Why can the slow process of democracy sometimes be considered a benefit?

24 Which option correctly separates an argument against and an argument for democracy?

25 What does the ability to change government give people in democracy?

Was this question useful?

Student Reviews

Add Muft Shiksha to your Home Screen