Question 1

If a democracy is slow in decision making but listens to different groups before deciding which conclusion is most balanced?

Accepted Answer

Discussion can improve decision quality but may take time Democratic discussion has both a benefit and a cost. Listening to different groups brings more experiences, interests, and possible effects into the decision. This can reveal problems, improve the quality of a policy, and make the final decision more acceptable. However, consultation, debate, disagreement, and the effort to reach agreement can take time. Therefore, speed alone cannot be used as the only measure of a good democratic decision.

Option B is correct because it presents both sides fairly: discussion may improve decision quality but may also cause delay. Option A is an extreme claim, since delay does not automatically make democracy useless. Option C ignores the people's role, and option D falsely assumes that a fast decision is always right. The balanced conclusion recognises a real weakness while also explaining the value of participation and careful consideration.

Question 2

If an elected government avoids listening to public criticism which argument in favour of democracy becomes weak?

Accepted Answer

Government accountability A major benefit of democracy is accountability but avoiding criticism weakens it. Exam tip: do not separate elections from accountability.

Question 3

When critics say popular leaders are not always competent which problem are they pointing to?

Accepted Answer

Problem of difference between popularity and competence Winning elections is not always proof of administrative competence. Exam tip: remember the difference between popularity and competence.

Question 4

If elections in democracy are very costly and money power starts influencing them which argument is strengthened?

Accepted Answer

Election expense argument against democracy Very high election expense can become a criticism of democracy. Exam tip: understand money power and election cost together.

Question 5

Why is the dignity argument in democracy not limited only to voting?

Accepted Answer

Because citizens also get respect for opinion criticism and participation The direct answer is A: citizens receive respect for their opinions, criticism, and participation. Dignity in democracy means treating every person as a valuable and equal citizen, not merely allowing that person to cast one vote. Step by step: citizens have views; they can express those views; they may question or criticise rulers; they can participate in public discussion and political activity; their voice is considered in governing. These opportunities recognise their self-respect and political equality. Option A is correct because dignity includes voice, respectful treatment, criticism, and participation along with voting. Option B is wrong because forced silence denies dignity. Option C is wrong because democratic government is answerable to the people, not above them. Option D is wrong because elections are a central way citizens choose and control representatives. A useful cue is: democracy respects citizens before, during, and after voting.

Question 6

If parties in democracy make unrealistic promises only to win which criticism is appropriate?

Accepted Answer

Populist politics may reduce the quality of democracy Unrealistic promises for electoral gain can weaken democratic debate. Exam tip: treat populism as criticism.

Question 7

Which democratic advantage is most clearly shown by the argument of peaceful transfer of power?

Accepted Answer

Ability to change government without violence Elections provide a peaceful method of power transfer. Exam tip: place power transfer under strong points of democracy.

Question 8

If a system gives quick decisions but does not take people's consent what counter argument supports democracy?

Accepted Answer

People's consent gives legitimacy to decisions Democracy links legitimacy of decisions with people's consent. Exam tip: understand difference between speed and legitimacy.

Question 9

If a policy is delayed due to debate but later has fewer mistakes how should this be understood?

Accepted Answer

There is a balance between delay and quality Direct answer: Option B, there is a balance between delay and quality. Democratic discussion can slow a decision because different people need time to present evidence, question a proposal, and consider alternatives. However, this time may reduce mistakes and improve the final policy. The reasoning is: debate causes some delay; debate allows scrutiny and correction; scrutiny can produce a better decision; therefore delay is a possible cost, while improved quality is a possible benefit. Option B correctly recognizes both sides instead of judging delay alone. Option A is wrong because debate is not always harmful; thoughtful discussion can prevent serious errors. Option C is wrong because democracy includes ways to correct policies through criticism, participation, courts, administration, and elections. Option D is wrong because people’s role does not end when debate takes place; participation is the reason debate occurs. The question describes a trade-off, not a complete failure. Memory cue: democracy may be slower, but careful discussion can make decisions wiser.

Question 10

The argument of emotional voting against democracy challenges what?

Accepted Answer

Assumption of thoughtful voter judgement This argument assumes voters may sometimes be influenced by emotions. Exam tip: place it under criticism of voter capacity.

Question 11

If people replace a bad government next time in democracy which favourable argument is proved?

Accepted Answer

Ability to correct mistakes Democracy gives a chance to replace a bad government. Exam tip: treat possibility of correction as an advantage.

Question 12

What condition is necessary along with majority decision making in democracy?

Accepted Answer

Respect for dignity of minorities and individuals Democracy is not only majority but also respect for rights and dignity. Exam tip: write balance between majority and rights.

Question 13

If political competition starts dividing society into groups which criticism of democracy appears?

Accepted Answer

Electoral competition may cause polarisation Political competition may sometimes increase social polarisation. Exam tip: place polarisation under arguments against democracy.

Question 14

Why does people's participation increase the legitimacy of decisions in democracy?

Accepted Answer

Because decisions are linked with people's consent Direct answer: Option A, decisions are linked with people’s consent. Legitimacy means that people regard a decision or government as rightful, acceptable, and deserving obedience. In democracy, participation allows citizens to express preferences directly or through representatives. The reasoning is: people take part; their views help shape or authorize the decision; they feel recognized and represented; the decision gains wider acceptance and legitimacy. Participation does not mean that every person gets exactly the result they wanted, but it means the process respects public consent and equal citizenship. Option A is correct because it connects participation with consent. Option B is wrong because hiding decisions removes public understanding and weakens legitimacy. Option C is wrong because democracy is not based only on a leader’s will; leaders are limited by citizens, laws, and institutions. Option D is wrong because participation includes citizens’ opinions rather than removing them. Memory cue: participation gives decisions public consent, and consent strengthens legitimacy.

Question 15

When critics say leaders remain busy winning elections what risk do they show?

Accepted Answer

Risk of losing focus on public service Direct answer: Option A, risk of losing focus on public service. Democracy requires leaders to serve people, make policies, and solve public problems. Critics warn that if leaders concentrate mainly on winning the next election, they may prefer attractive slogans, short-term benefits, or vote-catching decisions instead of careful long-term work. The reasoning is: election competition increases the need to win; excessive focus on victory can reduce attention to administration and public welfare; therefore public service may suffer. Option A correctly names this risk. Option B is wrong because increasing citizen dignity is a benefit of democracy, not the danger described. Option C is wrong because peaceful change of rulers is a democratic advantage. Option D is wrong because greater accountability is also a positive feature. Memory cue: when election victory comes before people’s welfare, think “power race versus public service.”

Question 16

In democracy open debate not only gives citizens the right to speak but what else does it do?

Accepted Answer

Helps understand issues and question government The direct answer is A: open debate helps citizens understand issues and question the government. Debate is not merely permission to speak. When different views are presented, people hear reasons, compare evidence, identify problems, and form informed opinions. They can then ask the government why a decision was taken and whether it should be changed. Thus the chain is: discussion gives information; understanding improves; questioning creates scrutiny and accountability. Option A is correct. Option B is wrong because debate does not stop elections; it can help voters make better choices. Option C is wrong because democratic debate protects and uses rights rather than ending them. Option D is wrong because debate does not make any government permanent; elections and public judgment can change it. Remember: open discussion creates informed citizens, not automatic delay.

Question 17

How is the accountability argument in democracy different from authoritarian rule?

Accepted Answer

In democracy rulers answer to the people In democracy rulers are answerable to people. Exam tip: write accountability as a core advantage of democracy.

Question 18

If there is much disagreement over decisions in democracy what positive point can supporters mention?

Accepted Answer

Disagreement brings different viewpoints forward Direct answer: A, disagreement brings different viewpoints forward. Democracy includes discussion, debate, and the possibility that citizens or parties will disagree. Step by step: people may understand a problem differently; disagreement makes these different views visible; debate can expose missing facts or weaknesses in a proposed decision; the final decision can then be improved or publicly examined. Option A is correct because disagreement can increase the quality and openness of decision-making. Option B is wrong because disagreement does not always silence citizens; in a democracy it often encourages them to speak. Option C is wrong because elections do not end merely because people disagree; elections provide a peaceful way to choose representatives. Option D is wrong because disagreement does not make a ruler permanent; democratic disagreement can even lead to a change of government. Disagreement may sometimes delay a decision, but that criticism does not remove its positive value. Exam cue: dissent can reveal weaknesses and support correction.

Question 19

The argument against repeated elections in democracy is linked with which practical problem?

Accepted Answer

Increase in expense and political preoccupation Frequent elections can create issues of cost and political attention. Exam tip: place practical cost under criticism.

Question 20

When can decisions in democracy be closer to people's needs?

Accepted Answer

When views of citizens and groups are heard Public participation helps government understand real problems. Exam tip: keep participation and responsive governance together.

Question 21

If leaders in democracy take short term decisions only to please voters which criticism will arise?

Accepted Answer

Criticism of populist and short term politics Short term decisions for votes may weaken long term interest. Exam tip: identify populist politics.

Question 22

Which moral foundation is strengthened when citizens' voices are valued in democracy?

Accepted Answer

Equal respect and dignity Democracy treats citizens as respected participants. Exam tip: understand dignity as moral basis of democracy.

Question 23

If an argument says that popular people gain influence over experts in democracy which category does it belong to?

Accepted Answer

Criticism against democracy The direct answer is A: criticism against democracy. The statement says that popular people may gain influence even when experts are more competent. This presents a possible weakness: public popularity and technical ability are not always the same. The reasoning is: democracy gives weight to voters' choices; voters may prefer a famous or popular person; that person may not be the best expert; therefore the argument questions whether democratic selection always produces the most competent decision-maker. Option A is correct because it identifies a criticism, not a benefit. Option B, moral advantage, would refer to equality, dignity or participation, whereas this statement highlights a problem. Option C, peaceful change, concerns replacing governments without violence and is not discussed here. Option D, respect for rights, concerns protection of freedoms and is also not the issue. This criticism does not prove democracy is always bad; it identifies a risk that voters and institutions should address. Memory cue: popularity versus expertise is a criticism.

Question 24

With what limitation should the argument that people can correct their mistakes in democracy be understood?

Accepted Answer

Correction is possible but needs time and political awareness Democracy gives chance of correction but citizen awareness is also needed. Exam tip: write the argument in a balanced way.

Question 25

If society has deep differences which aspect of democracy can be especially useful?

Accepted Answer

System of dialogue and compromise Democracy provides a chance to handle differences through dialogue. Exam tip: connect diverse society with dialogue.

Arguments for and against democracy

Practice questions

01 If a democracy is slow in decision making but listens to different groups before deciding which conclusion is most balanced?

02 If an elected government avoids listening to public criticism which argument in favour of democracy becomes weak?

03 When critics say popular leaders are not always competent which problem are they pointing to?

04 If elections in democracy are very costly and money power starts influencing them which argument is strengthened?

05 Why is the dignity argument in democracy not limited only to voting?

06 If parties in democracy make unrealistic promises only to win which criticism is appropriate?

07 Which democratic advantage is most clearly shown by the argument of peaceful transfer of power?

08 If a system gives quick decisions but does not take people's consent what counter argument supports democracy?

09 If a policy is delayed due to debate but later has fewer mistakes how should this be understood?

10 The argument of emotional voting against democracy challenges what?

11 If people replace a bad government next time in democracy which favourable argument is proved?

12 What condition is necessary along with majority decision making in democracy?

13 If political competition starts dividing society into groups which criticism of democracy appears?

14 Why does people's participation increase the legitimacy of decisions in democracy?

15 When critics say leaders remain busy winning elections what risk do they show?

16 In democracy open debate not only gives citizens the right to speak but what else does it do?

17 How is the accountability argument in democracy different from authoritarian rule?

18 If there is much disagreement over decisions in democracy what positive point can supporters mention?

19 The argument against repeated elections in democracy is linked with which practical problem?

20 When can decisions in democracy be closer to people's needs?

21 If leaders in democracy take short term decisions only to please voters which criticism will arise?

22 Which moral foundation is strengthened when citizens' voices are valued in democracy?

23 If an argument says that popular people gain influence over experts in democracy which category does it belong to?

24 With what limitation should the argument that people can correct their mistakes in democracy be understood?

25 If society has deep differences which aspect of democracy can be especially useful?

Was this question useful?

Student Reviews

Add Muft Shiksha to your Home Screen