Question 1

Why is it incomplete to treat slow decision making in democracy only as a weakness?

Accepted Answer

Because deliberation can make decisions more inclusive and responsible Slow process is a criticism but it can include more viewpoints. In exams view both speed and quality together.

Question 2

If people choose a wrong government in democracy which corrective argument can be given in its favour?

Accepted Answer

People can change the government in the next election Democracy does not remove all chances of mistakes but gives a path for correction. In exams connect elections with corrective capacity.

Question 3

Money power most challenges which claim of democracy?

Accepted Answer

All citizens get equal political importance Direct answer: Option C, all citizens get equal political importance. A basic democratic claim is political equality: each adult citizen should have equal voting value and a fair chance to participate. Money power can challenge this when wealthy candidates, groups, or donors obtain greater publicity, influence, campaign resources, or access to decision-makers. The reasoning is: unequal economic resources create unequal political influence; unequal influence weakens the practical meaning of equal citizenship; therefore money power most directly challenges political equality. Option C is correct. Option A is wrong because democracy does not claim that every government is permanent. Option B is wrong because democracy accepts differences and does not promise that they always end. Option D is wrong because laws are necessary for protecting rights and controlling power. This criticism does not mean every use of money is automatically illegal; it means excessive economic influence can make formal equality less real. Memory cue: one person, one vote can be weakened when money gives some voices much louder reach.

Question 4

If leaders make impractical promises to win elections which criticism applies to democracy?

Accepted Answer

Politics can become a race for power instead of public service Direct answer: Option D, politics can become a race for power instead of public service. An impractical promise is often made because it sounds attractive to voters, even when the leader cannot responsibly fulfil it. The reasoning is: desire to win encourages vote-catching promises; unrealistic promises may put electoral advantage above sound policy; politics may then become competition for office rather than service to citizens. Option D states this criticism precisely. Option A is wrong because a promise does not automatically end people’s consent. Option B is wrong because democratic campaigns do involve communication and promises. Option C is too absolute: some elections may have problems, but an impractical promise alone does not prove that elections are always unfair. The issue here is the motive and quality of political competition, not the existence of elections. Memory cue: attractive but impossible promises may show “votes first, public welfare later.”

Question 5

How does debate become a tool for improving decisions in democracy?

Accepted Answer

It brings out weaknesses and alternatives of a decision Debate can help identify mistakes early. In exams connect public debate with decision quality.

Question 6

Why is people's consent such an important argument in favour of democracy?

Accepted Answer

Because it gives democratic legitimacy to governance The direct answer is Option B: it gives democratic legitimacy to governance. People’s consent matters because a government should not rule merely through force, family privilege, money, or silence. Step by step: citizens express their preferences; elections and public participation show consent; leaders receive authority from that consent; the government is therefore democratically legitimate. Option A is wrong because consent does not make power hereditary; hereditary rule passes power through a family. Option B is correct because it states the exact link between consent and legitimacy. Option C is wrong because democracy encourages citizens to speak, not become silent. Option D is wrong because elections remain necessary for choosing and judging representatives. Consent may be expressed in elections, but it does not remove the need for elections. Memory cue: people’s consent is the foundation of legitimate democratic rule.

Question 7

Voters are not experts in every complex policy is what type of criticism of democracy?

Accepted Answer

Criticism related to limits of knowledge and information This criticism is based on limits of voters' information. In exams identify it as an argument against democracy.

Question 8

How is the citizen dignity argument in democracy basically different from dictatorship?

Accepted Answer

Democracy treats a citizen as a participant with vote and voice Democracy does not treat citizens only as order followers. In exams connect dignity with participation.

Question 9

If a government changes policy after listening to criticism which strength of democracy is shown?

Accepted Answer

Capacity for correction and accountability Criticism gives government a chance to improve. In exams connect criticism with democracy's corrective capacity.

Question 10

When does electoral competition become an argument in favour of democracy?

Accepted Answer

When it pushes leaders to focus on people's needs Healthy competition can make leaders answerable to people. In exams remember the positive side of competition.

Question 11

When does electoral competition become a criticism of democracy?

Accepted Answer

When competition becomes power struggle instead of public service Power struggle can weaken democratic politics. In exams understand the difference between public service and power race.

Question 12

Voters influenced by misinformation create which challenge for democracy?

Accepted Answer

Voter decisions can be misled Misinformation can affect the quality of electoral decisions. In exams understand quality of information as a challenge of democracy.

Question 13

Deliberation in democracy can be slow yet why can it increase acceptability?

Accepted Answer

Because it can include views of affected people Hearing affected people makes a decision more acceptable. In exams write the balance of delay and acceptability.

Question 14

In the context of social differences what is the strongest point of democracy?

Accepted Answer

Providing a path for peaceful solution through dialogue Democracy directs differences toward dialogue instead of violence. In exams write peaceful conflict resolution.

Question 15

If leaders ignore people's needs which mechanism of democracy can make them answerable?

Accepted Answer

People's decision in the next election The direct answer is D: the people’s decision in the next election. Democracy gives citizens the power to choose representatives and to remove them peacefully. If leaders ignore public needs, citizens can question them, criticize their work, and vote against them in the next election. The reasoning is: people elect leaders; leaders need public support to remain in office; poor performance can reduce that support; voters can then choose another candidate. Option A, dynasty tradition, does not make a leader answerable because inherited power may continue even without good work. Option B, military order, uses force rather than public consent and is not democratic accountability. Option C, secret rule, hides decisions and prevents people from checking the government. Option D is correct because regular elections allow citizens to judge the leaders’ work and reward or replace them. Memory cue: elections create political accountability.

Question 16

Why can emotional public opinion become a challenge for democracy?

Accepted Answer

Because public opinion may be influenced by emotion instead of reason The direct answer is A: public opinion may be influenced by emotion instead of reason. Public opinion means the views held or expressed by people about an issue. It can help democracy when citizens examine facts, listen to other sides, and discuss calmly. Step by step: an issue appears; people receive information; if fear, anger, prejudice, or dramatic claims dominate, they may react emotionally; they may support a harmful policy without checking evidence; decision-making can then become less thoughtful. Option A is correct because emotional opinion can weaken reasoned democratic judgment. Option B is wrong because citizens do express opinions in a democracy. Option C is wrong because the question concerns the quality of opinion, not whether elections exist. Option D is wrong because government accountability is a democratic safeguard, not the reason emotional opinion is a challenge. Open debate, reliable information, and fact-checking can reduce this danger. Exam cue: emotion without evidence can mislead public decision-making.

Question 17

How does public debate test decisions in democracy?

Accepted Answer

By bringing out weaknesses and alternatives Direct answer: Option C, by bringing out weaknesses and alternatives. Public debate allows different people to examine a proposed decision before or after it is implemented. The step-by-step process is: a plan is presented; citizens, experts, opposition groups, and media ask questions; weaknesses, costs, neglected groups, and possible alternatives become visible; decision-makers may revise the plan; the final decision can therefore become more informed and responsive. Option C is correct. Option A is wrong because secrecy prevents open testing and reduces public scrutiny. Option B is wrong because excluding citizens removes valuable experiences and opinions. Option D is wrong because debate does not make a government permanent; governments remain subject to review and replacement. Debate may sometimes be slow or noisy, but that is different from being useless. Memory cue: public debate is a test—questions reveal weaknesses and alternatives improve choices.

Question 18

Policy made after consultation with many groups shows which benefit of democracy?

Accepted Answer

More inclusive decision Hearing many groups can include more interests in decisions. In exams write inclusive decision as a benefit.

Question 19

Elections affected by corruption can weaken which outcome of democracy?

Accepted Answer

Fair representation Corruption can distort representation. In exams write corruption as a challenge to democratic fairness.

Question 20

The right to change government most strongly supports which argument of democracy?

Accepted Answer

Accountable governance The right to change government keeps leaders answerable to people. In exams write change and accountability together.

Question 21

If someone says all citizens are not experts so democracy is unacceptable what is the balanced response?

Accepted Answer

There is a limitation of expertise but discussion and accountability give chance for improvement Lack of expertise is a challenge but democracy has correction mechanisms. In exams give a balanced answer.

Question 22

How can opposition criticism work in favour of democracy?

Accepted Answer

It increases watch and accountability over government An opposition is important because democracy requires the government to be questioned, not merely obeyed. Opposition members can examine policies, point out mistakes, raise the concerns of people who are not in power, ask for explanations, and use legislatures, committees, media, or public debate to scrutinise decisions. This pressure encourages ministers and officials to justify their actions and correct problems. It therefore strengthens accountability and helps prevent misuse of power.

Option A is correct because criticism can increase oversight and accountability. Constructive criticism does not mean opposing every proposal or preventing all government work; it means examining power openly and offering alternatives when appropriate. The other choices wrongly say that opposition ends elections, removes rights, or excludes citizens. In a democracy, a responsible opposition is part of public participation and helps ensure that government remains answerable to the people.

Question 23

A criticism of democracy related to coalition government can be based on what?

Accepted Answer

Compromises and delays in policy decisions may increase In a coalition agreement among many parties can slow decisions. In exams connect it with criticism of decision process.

Question 24

If citizens' role is limited only to voting which broader aspect of democracy will weaken?

Accepted Answer

Public deliberation and active participation Democracy needs discussion and watchfulness along with voting. In exams understand citizens' role broadly.

Question 25

How does people's participation strengthen democracy's corrective capacity?

Accepted Answer

People can challenge wrong policies and bring change Active participation keeps pressure on government for improvement. In exams write participation and correction together.

Arguments for and against democracy

Practice questions

01 Why is it incomplete to treat slow decision making in democracy only as a weakness?

02 If people choose a wrong government in democracy which corrective argument can be given in its favour?

03 Money power most challenges which claim of democracy?

04 If leaders make impractical promises to win elections which criticism applies to democracy?

05 How does debate become a tool for improving decisions in democracy?

06 Why is people's consent such an important argument in favour of democracy?

07 Voters are not experts in every complex policy is what type of criticism of democracy?

08 How is the citizen dignity argument in democracy basically different from dictatorship?

09 If a government changes policy after listening to criticism which strength of democracy is shown?

10 When does electoral competition become an argument in favour of democracy?

11 When does electoral competition become a criticism of democracy?

12 Voters influenced by misinformation create which challenge for democracy?

13 Deliberation in democracy can be slow yet why can it increase acceptability?

14 In the context of social differences what is the strongest point of democracy?

15 If leaders ignore people's needs which mechanism of democracy can make them answerable?

16 Why can emotional public opinion become a challenge for democracy?

17 How does public debate test decisions in democracy?

18 Policy made after consultation with many groups shows which benefit of democracy?

19 Elections affected by corruption can weaken which outcome of democracy?

20 The right to change government most strongly supports which argument of democracy?

21 If someone says all citizens are not experts so democracy is unacceptable what is the balanced response?

22 How can opposition criticism work in favour of democracy?

23 A criticism of democracy related to coalition government can be based on what?

24 If citizens' role is limited only to voting which broader aspect of democracy will weaken?

25 How does people's participation strengthen democracy's corrective capacity?

Was this question useful?

Student Reviews

Add Muft Shiksha to your Home Screen