Muft Shiksha™ एक 100% Free Education Portal है 🇮🇳, जिसका उद्देश्य Class 9–12 के हर विद्यार्थी तक High-Quality Education को पूरी तरह मुफ्त पहुँचाना है। 🇮🇳 हम मानते हैं कि अच्छी शिक्षा किसी student की आर्थिक स्थिति पर निर्भर नहीं होनी चाहिए। 🇮🇳 हर विद्यार्थी को वही Quality Study Material, MCQs, Quizzes, Exam Preparation, Concept-Based Learning और Bilingual Support मिलना चाहिए, जो आमतौर पर महंगी Coaching या Premium Platforms में मिलता है। Muft Shiksha™ 🇮🇳 इसी सोच के साथ बनाया गया है
In this Class 9 Civics topic from the chapter Democratic Rights, students learn how the Right to Freedom protects individual liberty in a democracy. The topic explains key freedoms under Article 19, including speech and expression, peaceful assembly, forming associations, movement, residence, and profession. It also introduces safeguards against arbitrary arrest and detention, along with the importance of reasonable restrictions that balance personal freedom with public order, security, and the rights of others.
TOPIC PRACTICE
Quiz this set
Up to 25 questions from this page. Select your focus, then start.
25 questions
Choose questions
Expert · Level 5View options
It always makes criticism a crime
It allows citizens and media to question decisions of power
It hides government from people
It ends public debate
Expert · Level 5View options
It is correct balance
It further strengthens rights
It removes the difference between reasonable restriction and repression
It is a problem related to education right
Expert · Level 5View options
Both are the same
Repression is always valid
Reasonable restriction has no relation with freedom
Reasonable restriction is limited and reasoned, repression suppresses freedom without sufficient reason
Expert · Level 5View options
It protects civic dissent and prevents violence from becoming a right
It makes every assembly a crime
It stops citizens from meeting
It recognizes only government gatherings
Expert · Level 5View options
Because every protest is always violent
Because a complete permanent ban can go beyond reasonable restriction and become repression
Because there is no right of assembly
Because assembly happens only on election day
Expert · Level 5View options
It lets citizens collectively present ideas, demands, and campaigns
It places every association above law
It isolates all citizens
It protects only violent groups
Expert · Level 5View options
When an association discusses books
When an association promotes violence and crime
When an association runs a cleanliness campaign
When an association gives a peaceful memorandum
Expert · Level 5View options
It gives citizens access to better places for education, employment, and life
It places citizens outside law
It binds citizens to birthplace
It makes every state a separate country
Expert · Level 5View options
Only on the basis of caste
Only on the basis of religion
For a valid reason of public health or safety
Because of dislike of a state
Expert · Level 5View options
Equal civic opportunity within the country
Separate citizenship of every state
Permanent bondage to birthplace
Permanent social class
Expert · Level 5View options
Concern of religious propagation
Unfair restriction on freedom of residence
Concern of abolition of titles
Concern of human trafficking
Expert · Level 5View options
So that qualifications and law can protect society from harm
So every work becomes a crime
So the right to choose profession ends
So profession is fixed only by birth
Expert · Level 5View options
Because professional freedom may be limited by public safety and qualification rules
Because choosing any profession is not a Fundamental Right
Because medicine is always illegal
Because qualification is always discrimination
Expert · Level 5View options
Only the right to breathe
Protection of life including dignity, security, and protection from arbitrary detention
Only the right to receive title
Only the right to trade
Expert · Level 5View options
Arbitrary arrest and detention
Peaceful criticism
Formation of associations
Receiving education
Expert · Level 5View options
Because knowing the reason helps the person prepare defence
Because it keeps arrest secret
Because it ends the need for lawyer
Because it ends the role of court
Expert · Level 5View options
It makes legal defence and fair procedure possible
It makes police the final court
It makes detention endless
It stops the person from knowing reasons
Expert · Level 5View options
Arbitrary detention without judicial oversight
Excess freedom of expression
Too much education
Ability to form association
Expert · Level 5View options
Right to title
Religious propagation
Personal liberty and fair procedure
Linguistic right
Expert · Level 5View options
It gives the child knowledge, capacity, and preparation for free life
It does not remove children from work
It gives only title
It stops ideas
Expert · Level 5View options
The child's future freedom capacity and development weaken
The child receives a title
The child's expression automatically increases
The child gets public employment
Expert · Level 5View options
Because press is a medium of ideas, information, and criticism
Because press distributes titles
Because press is only trade and not rights
Because press keeps citizens silent
Expert · Level 5View options
Accountability of power and informed citizenship
Untouchability
Begar
Hereditary title
Expert · Level 5View options
Because the medium changes but false violent rumors can cause public harm
Because there are no rights on digital platforms
Because every online statement is a crime
Because responsibility applies only to newspapers
Expert · Level 5View options
Whether dissent is being treated as disorder to suppress expression
Whether the title is written correctly
Whether trafficking happened
Whether education age changed
Question 1ExpertLevel 5
What is the deepest relation between freedom of expression and accountability of power?
Correct answer: B
Expression is a democratic tool to monitor power. Exam tip: connect criticism with accountability.
If peaceful online criticism is removed only because of disagreement, what core question arises?
Correct answer: A
Direct answer: Option A is correct. Peaceful online criticism is a form of expression. Disagreement with the government, an official or another powerful person does not by itself turn that expression into disorder. The core constitutional question is whether authorities are wrongly treating dissent as a public-order threat in order to silence speech. Reasoning step by step: a person posts a peaceful criticism; no violence or immediate unlawful danger is stated; removal occurs only because someone disagrees; therefore the action raises a freedom-of-expression and censorship concern. Option A is correct because it identifies that concern. Option B is irrelevant because correct spelling of a title has nothing to do with online speech. Option C is irrelevant because trafficking involves exploitation or illegal trade in persons, not criticism. Option D is irrelevant because the educational age is not connected with expression or public order here. This does not mean every online post is protected: threats, incitement and unlawful harm may justify lawful restrictions. Memory cue: disagreement alone is not disorder; look for a real threat before accepting censorship.
Google Analytics helps us understand site usage. Google may send limited cookie-free signals before your choice. The Live Visitors widget operates independently of this analytics choice; see the privacy policy for its provider and fallback details. Essential site features work without analytics cookies. You can change your choice later in Privacy choices. Privacy policy