Civics
Right to Constitutional RemediesExpanding scope of rights
Practice questions
What is the main difference between Habeas Corpus and Mandamus?In which situation does expanded scope mean not only adding a new right but also new interpretation?Why are institutions like Human Rights Commissions important for rights protection even though they are different from constitutional remedies?If a person directly approaches the Supreme Court for violation of rights, which right is being used?Why can constitutional remedies be called the final safeguard of democratic rights?What is the simple difference between Prohibition and Certiorari?In which situation can judicial expansion of rights strengthen social justice?If a person is illegally holding a public office, which writ may be suitable?How does placing dignity at the centre of expansion of rights change the understanding of right to life?Which option correctly states the relation between constitutional remedies and PIL?Which question would most directly test the concept of constitutional remedies?If a court links environmental pollution with the right to life, what is it doing?In which situation would a request for Mandamus be weak?What kind of role does the Right to Constitutional Remedies give to courts?Expansion of rights reflects which feature of the Constitution?In which example is the social usefulness of PIL most visible?If it is not possible to approach court to protect a right, which democratic value is affected?Which option shows the broader importance of constitutional remedies rather than a narrow meaning?In which situation may Certiorari be more needed?In which situation would the writ of Prohibition be more suitable?