Muft Shiksha™ एक 100% Free Education Portal है 🇮🇳, जिसका उद्देश्य Class 9–12 के हर विद्यार्थी तक High-Quality Education को पूरी तरह मुफ्त पहुँचाना है। 🇮🇳 हम मानते हैं कि अच्छी शिक्षा किसी student की आर्थिक स्थिति पर निर्भर नहीं होनी चाहिए। 🇮🇳 हर विद्यार्थी को वही Quality Study Material, MCQs, Quizzes, Exam Preparation, Concept-Based Learning और Bilingual Support मिलना चाहिए, जो आमतौर पर महंगी Coaching या Premium Platforms में मिलता है। Muft Shiksha™ 🇮🇳 इसी सोच के साथ बनाया गया है
In this Class 9 Civics topic from the chapter Constitutional Design, students explore why a constitution is essential for a democratic country. They learn how it establishes the basic rules of government, defines the powers and limits of institutions, protects citizens’ rights, and expresses shared values and goals. The topic also explains how a constitution builds trust among diverse communities and provides a framework for resolving disagreements while preventing the arbitrary use of power.
Practice questions
01 How does a constitution make government legitimacy different from mere force?
0 reads0 helpful★ – (0)
Answer and explanation
Correct answer: A. It bases governance on people's consent, rules and rights
Explanation: Direct answer: A. Force can make people obey for a time, but obedience produced by fear is not the same as legitimate government. A constitution connects public authority with an accepted framework of rules, institutions, rights and procedures. In a democracy, people give consent through constitutional and electoral arrangements, while government must exercise power within legal limits. This makes authority answerable and gives citizens standards by which to judge it. B is wrong because fear is a method of coercion, not the democratic basis of legitimacy. C is wrong because consent is central to democratic authority. D is wrong because protection of rights helps distinguish lawful government from arbitrary force. Memory cue: force compels; legitimacy justifies power through consent and rules.
02 If the constitution has no system to check power, why can written rights also become weak?
0 reads0 helpful★ – (0)
Answer and explanation
Correct answer: A. Because there will be no institutional check to stop rights violations
Explanation: Direct answer: A. Written rights state what citizens should enjoy, but powerful authorities may still violate those rights unless institutions can examine and restrain their actions. Checks may include independent courts, legislative oversight, lawful procedures and other constitutional limits. These mechanisms do not make every violation impossible, but they create ways to question misuse of power and seek a remedy. B is wrong because rights do not enforce themselves; people need institutions and procedures. C is wrong because unchecked power is more vulnerable to arbitrariness, not automatically more just. D is wrong because rights are essential protections for citizens. Memory cue: rights are the promise; checks are the protection that helps keep the promise.
03 Writing the powers of central and regional governments in a constitution is linked with which larger purpose?
0 reads0 helpful★ – (0)
Answer and explanation
Correct answer: A. Reducing conflict and creating a balance of power
Explanation: The correct answer is A: reducing conflict and creating a balance of power. A constitution explains which level of government can make decisions and use particular powers. This division is important in a federal system, where the central government and regional governments both have their own responsibilities. Clear rules reduce confusion and prevent one level from unnecessarily taking over the work of another. They also help different regions protect their interests while remaining part of one country. Option A is correct because power-sharing can reduce disputes and support cooperation. Option B is wrong because dividing powers does not mean keeping every power at the centre. Option C is wrong because federal arrangements usually recognise regional diversity rather than erase it. Option D is wrong because defining governmental powers is not meant to reduce citizens' rights; it can help protect them by limiting arbitrary action. Memory cue: federalism means shared power with clearly defined responsibilities.
04 Why can a constitution be called a document of citizens' dignity?
0 reads0 helpful★ – (0)
Answer and explanation
Correct answer: A. Because it treats citizens as persons with rights and equal status
Explanation: The correct answer is A: a constitution treats citizens as persons with rights and equal status. Dignity means that every person deserves respect and should not be treated as inferior, helpless or merely obedient. A constitution expresses this idea by recognising rights, equality before law and limits on government power. These rules allow citizens to question unfair treatment and participate in public life. Option A is correct because rights and equal status give people a secure basis for respect. Option B is wrong because democracy does not reduce citizens to silent order-followers. Option C is wrong because rights must be publicly known if people are to claim and protect them. Option D is wrong because the government exists to serve citizens under constitutional rules, not to become unrelated to them. Memory cue: dignity grows when a person is recognised as an equal rights-holder, not as a subject of unchecked power.
05 If a constitution lacks accountability mechanisms, what deficiency will representative government suffer from?
0 reads0 helpful★ – (0)
Answer and explanation
Correct answer: A. Representatives may become less answerable to the people
Explanation: The correct answer is A: representatives may become less answerable to the people. In representative government, citizens elect people to make decisions on their behalf. Representation alone is not enough; representatives must also explain their actions, follow constitutional limits and face lawful checks. Accountability mechanisms may include elections, legislative oversight, public discussion, courts and other constitutional safeguards. Without them, elected leaders could ignore public concerns or misuse authority with fewer consequences. Option A is correct because the absence of accountability weakens the connection between representatives and citizens. Option B is wrong because removing checks does not create transparency. Option C is wrong because people generally lose effective control when representatives cannot be questioned. Option D is wrong because rights require institutions and enforcement, not automatic protection. Memory cue: representation chooses rulers; accountability makes them answerable.
06 If both the majority and the minority trust the constitution, what benefit does democracy gain?
0 reads0 helpful★ – (0)
Answer and explanation
Correct answer: A. Acceptance and stability of shared rules increase
Explanation: The correct answer is A: acceptance and stability of shared rules increase. Democracy involves disagreement, because people and groups may have different interests and opinions. A constitution gives them common rules for making decisions and settling disputes. When both the majority and minorities trust those rules, the majority accepts limits on its power and minorities have confidence that they will not be treated unfairly. This makes constitutional government more stable and peaceful. Option A is correct because shared trust supports cooperation and lawful change. Option B is wrong because constitutional trust should limit, not encourage, majority arbitrariness. Option C is wrong because a trusted constitution should protect minority rights. Option D is wrong because trust in rules does not remove the need for elections; elections remain a way to choose representatives. Memory cue: democracy is strongest when winners accept limits and losers accept lawful results.
07 Why can ideas such as basic rights and policy goals exist together in a constitution?
0 reads0 helpful★ – (0)
Answer and explanation
Correct answer: A. Because a constitution gives both present protection and future direction
Explanation: The correct answer is A: a constitution can give present protection and future direction. Basic rights protect people from unfair treatment and unjustified government action in the present. Policy goals express the kind of society the state should work towards in the future, such as greater social and economic justice. These ideas are not automatically enemies. Rights set limits and protect individuals, while goals guide public policy and long-term reform. Option A is correct because a constitution can combine immediate safeguards with a vision for improvement. Option B is wrong because rights and goals may support each other when policy is designed fairly. Option C is wrong because policy goals should not be understood as permission to abolish rights. Option D is wrong because constitutions often guide future institutions and public action. Memory cue: rights protect today; constitutional goals help build a better tomorrow.
08 If a constitution includes both citizens' freedom and social equality, what broader aim does it show?
0 reads0 helpful★ – (0)
Answer and explanation
Correct answer: A. Building a free and just society
Explanation: Correct answer: A, building a free and just society. A constitution is not merely a rulebook for running offices; it also expresses the kind of society citizens wish to create. Freedom protects people from unnecessary or arbitrary interference, while social equality seeks equal respect, status and opportunities for people, including groups that have faced discrimination. When both ideas appear together, the constitution aims to combine liberty with justice. Option B is wrong because administrative convenience alone cannot protect dignity or equality. Option C is wrong because constitutional power is meant to serve the public, not become private property. Option D is wrong because the inclusion of rights expands protection rather than shrinking it. Memory cue: freedom protects choice; equality protects equal worth; together they support a just society.
09 If a constitution stresses only administrative efficiency and gives less importance to rights, what will be the problem?
0 reads0 helpful★ – (0)
Answer and explanation
Correct answer: A. Fast governance may weaken citizens' freedom
Explanation: Correct answer: A, fast governance may weaken citizens' freedom. Efficiency means that decisions are made quickly and administration works smoothly, but speed alone is not the purpose of constitutional government. Public authorities must also respect rights, equality and lawful limits. Without these safeguards, a government might take quick decisions that silence criticism, restrict liberty or treat some people unfairly. Option B is wrong because rights do not protect themselves; institutions and rules must protect them. Option C is wrong because democracy requires rights and accountability, not efficiency alone. Option D is wrong because courts remain important for interpreting the constitution and reviewing unlawful action. Memory cue: good governance must be both effective and rights-respecting.
10 Why is the idea of people's consent important in a constitution?
0 reads0 helpful★ – (0)
Answer and explanation
Correct answer: A. Because legitimacy of governance strengthens through citizens' acceptance
Explanation: Correct answer: A, citizens' acceptance strengthens the legitimacy of governance. Consent means that people recognise the basic rules of political life as having a valid public basis, rather than seeing them as the command of a ruler or a small group. It does not mean that every citizen agrees with every decision; it means that the constitutional system is accepted through democratic participation, representation or public commitment. Option B is wrong because excluding people weakens legitimacy. Option C is wrong because fear may force obedience but does not create democratic acceptance. Option D is wrong because a constitution should express public principles and limit officials, not merely record their wishes. Memory cue: consent gives authority a democratic foundation.
11 How does a constitution organise society, not merely control it?
0 reads0 helpful★ – (0)
Answer and explanation
Correct answer: A. By giving a framework of shared citizenship, institutions and rights
Explanation: Correct answer: A, by providing a framework of shared citizenship, institutions and rights. People in a society may differ in language, religion, region, class or opinion. A constitution gives them common rules for belonging to one political community. It identifies institutions, distributes powers, sets procedures and recognises rights, so disagreements can be handled through lawful methods rather than force. Option B is wrong because punishment alone cannot create cooperation or common membership. Option C is wrong because permanent separation prevents shared citizenship and mutual participation. Option D is wrong because unclear rights create uncertainty and allow arbitrary power. The constitution therefore organises relationships among citizens and institutions as well as limiting government. Memory cue: a constitution connects people through common rules, not just controls them through penalties.
12 If courts cannot interpret the constitution, what deficiency will arise in protecting rights?
0 reads0 helpful★ – (0)
Answer and explanation
Correct answer: A. Meaningful protection of rights in changing situations will be difficult
Explanation: Correct answer: A, meaningful protection of rights in changing situations would become difficult. Constitutional rights are written as general principles, while real disputes arise in new and specific circumstances. Courts interpret the constitutional text, examine the facts, and decide whether government action is consistent with the constitution. This does not mean judges can ignore the text; interpretation connects the text with lawful application. Option B is wrong because rights do not become clearer automatically. Option C is wrong because removing interpretation cannot guarantee fair government. Option D is wrong because citizens could lose an effective way to challenge violations. The judiciary is therefore an important safeguard, although constitutional protection also depends on other institutions and public respect for rights. Memory cue: text states the right; interpretation helps apply it to real cases.
13 Which reason for needing a constitution connects political equality and social respect?
0 reads0 helpful★ – (0)
Answer and explanation
Correct answer: A. Constitutional recognition of equal citizenship
Explanation: Correct answer: A, constitutional recognition of equal citizenship. Equal citizenship has a political side: each citizen is recognised as having equal status under the constitutional system and, where provided by law, an equal voice in public life. It also has a social side: people should not be treated as inferior because of caste, religion, gender, language or another identity. Option B is wrong because taxation is only one administrative function and does not by itself establish respect. Option C is wrong because an order can command conduct without recognising equal dignity. Option D is wrong because campaigning is temporary and cannot define permanent citizenship. Memory cue: equal citizenship means equal political standing plus equal human respect.
14 If a constitution lacks a peaceful process for changing government, what danger will arise?
0 reads0 helpful★ – (0)
Answer and explanation
Correct answer: A. Power struggle and instability may increase
Explanation: Correct answer: A, power struggle and instability may increase. A constitution should provide lawful procedures for choosing, replacing and holding governments accountable. Elections, defined terms, legislative processes and other constitutional rules make transfer of power predictable and peaceful. If no accepted process exists, competing groups may try to retain or capture power through pressure, conflict or unconstitutional action. Option B is wrong because democracy cannot become stronger without rules for peaceful change. Option C is wrong because instability usually makes rights and public security more vulnerable, not safer. Option D is wrong because disagreement among leaders is normal; rules are needed precisely because permanent agreement cannot be assumed. Memory cue: constitutional rules turn a dangerous power struggle into a regular political process.
15 What psychological security does the language of rights and limits in a constitution give citizens?
0 reads0 helpful★ – (0)
Answer and explanation
Correct answer: A. They know power cannot act completely arbitrarily
Explanation: Correct answer: A, citizens know that power cannot act completely arbitrarily. Rights tell citizens what protections they possess, while limits tell public authorities what they may not do or how they must act. This creates a reasonable sense of predictability and security: government decisions can be questioned when they cross constitutional boundaries. It does not promise that every violation will disappear, but it gives citizens standards and possible remedies. Option B is the opposite of constitutional protection. Option C is wrong because constitutional limits place government under law. Option D is wrong because courts and other institutions may help enforce those limits. Memory cue: rights protect citizens; limits restrain power; together they reduce fear of arbitrary rule.
16 If a constitution exists only on paper and political culture does not respect it, which conclusion is correct?
0 reads0 helpful★ – (0)
Answer and explanation
Correct answer: A. Observance and democratic culture are also necessary for success of constitution
Explanation: Correct answer: A, observance and democratic culture are also necessary. The written constitution provides principles, institutions and limits, but its success depends on people and authorities following those rules in practice. A democratic political culture includes respect for disagreement, lawful procedures, rights, equality and accountability. Option B is wrong because words on paper cannot by themselves prevent violations. Option C is wrong because rights need responsible institutions, public awareness and enforcement. Option D is wrong because everyday political behaviour determines whether constitutional values are respected or ignored. This does not make the written constitution unimportant; the text supplies the standard against which conduct can be judged. Memory cue: a constitution needs both a written framework and a living practice.
17 How do limits on powers and fixing responsibilities in a constitution make governance ethical?
0 reads0 helpful★ – (0)
Answer and explanation
Correct answer: A. By making power accountable and bound to public interest
Explanation: Correct answer: A, by making power accountable and bound to public interest. A constitution distributes authority, defines responsibilities and places legal limits on office-holders. Officials must explain or justify the use of public power, follow proper procedures and act within the law. These requirements reduce the chance that authority will be used for personal benefit, revenge or arbitrary control. Option B is wrong because private benefit is the opposite of public accountability. Option C is wrong because constitutional limits protect citizens from misuse of power rather than deliberately weakening them. Option D is wrong because ethical governance depends on clear rules, not the removal of rules. Accountability does not mean that every decision will be popular; it means power is answerable to constitutional standards and public interest. Memory cue: limited power plus responsibility produces accountable government.
18 Why is a constitution still necessary even if the majority keeps winning elections?
0 reads0 helpful★ – (0)
Answer and explanation
Correct answer: B. Because majority power must also remain limited by rights and rules
Explanation: Correct answer: B. A constitution is necessary because winning an election does not give a government unlimited power. First, elections decide who will govern. However, democracy also requires that the government respect the law, citizens’ rights and constitutional procedures. The majority may make decisions, but it cannot lawfully remove the basic rights of minorities or act arbitrarily. The constitution sets these limits before conflicts arise and provides institutions to protect them. Option A is wrong because even a victorious majority is subject to the constitution. Option B is correct because majority rule operates within rights and rules. Option C is wrong because elections remain important for choosing and replacing rulers. Option D is wrong because the constitution protects every citizen, including both majority and minority groups. Memory cue: democracy means majority rule plus constitutional limits, not majority rule without limits.
19 How does a constitution become the basis of legitimacy in a country?
0 reads0 helpful★ – (0)
Answer and explanation
Correct answer: C. It shows that power comes through rules and public consent
Explanation: Correct answer: C. Legitimacy means that people accept a government’s authority as rightful, not merely as the result of force. A constitution explains how rulers are chosen, what powers they possess and which procedures they must follow. In a democracy, these arrangements are connected with public consent because citizens or their representatives take part in creating and approving the basic rules. It also makes rulers accountable to law. Option A is wrong because constitutional government limits rulers and demands accountability. Option B is wrong because constitutions commonly protect citizens’ rights rather than separating them from rights. Option C is correct because rules and public consent make the exercise of power lawful and acceptable. Option D is wrong because military orders alone cannot provide democratic legitimacy. Memory cue: legitimate power is power obtained and used according to accepted rules, not power imposed by force.
20 Why is it important that constitutional rights can be enforced by courts?
0 reads0 helpful★ – (0)
Answer and explanation
Correct answer: D. So that rights receive real protection
Explanation: Correct answer: D. A right has practical value only when a person can seek protection if that right is violated. When constitutional rights are enforceable, citizens can approach the courts and ask for a remedy against unlawful action by public authorities. Courts can examine whether government action follows the constitution and can provide appropriate legal relief. Option A is wrong because enforceability prevents rights from remaining mere promises. Option B is wrong because enforcement requires the government to respect constitutional rights; it does not mean that government can ignore them. Option C is the opposite of the purpose of judicial enforcement, which gives citizens access to justice. Option D is correct because court enforcement turns constitutional protection into a usable remedy. Memory cue: a right without a remedy may be only a promise; an enforceable right can be defended.
21 In a diverse society, a constitution is needed not only for governance but also for what?
0 reads0 helpful★ – (0)
Answer and explanation
Correct answer: A. To build shared trust among diverse groups
Explanation: Correct answer: A. A diverse society contains people with different languages, religions, cultures, regions and social experiences. A constitution creates common rules that apply fairly to everyone while recognising and protecting important rights. This helps groups trust that their dignity and interests will not be ignored simply because another group is numerically stronger. It also provides peaceful ways to settle disagreements. Option A is correct because equal rules, rights and representation can build shared confidence among groups. Option B is wrong because a constitution need not erase identities; it can respect diversity. Option C is wrong because constitutional democracy rejects permanent domination by one community. Option D is wrong because constitutional protection may support linguistic and cultural rights rather than ending them. Memory cue: unity in a diverse democracy comes from equal respect, not from forced uniformity.
22 If institutional roles are unclear in a constitution, what crisis may arise?
0 reads0 helpful★ – (0)
Answer and explanation
Correct answer: C. Conflict and power struggles among institutions may increase
Explanation: Correct answer: C. A constitution should distribute authority among institutions and clarify who may make decisions, implement them and review them. If these roles are unclear, two institutions may claim the same power, or each may refuse to accept responsibility. Such uncertainty can produce conflict, delays and a struggle for control. Clear rules do not remove every disagreement, but they provide a lawful way to manage it. Option A is wrong because unclear institutional roles do not automatically empower citizens. Option B is wrong because unclear roles increase the need for rules rather than removing it. Option C is correct because overlapping or uncertain powers can create institutional conflict. Option D is wrong because constitutional confusion can make governance and elections more difficult. Memory cue: clear powers create accountability; unclear powers create blame and conflict.
23 Which statement best explains the idea of constitutionalism?
0 reads0 helpful★ – (0)
Answer and explanation
Correct answer: A. Power remains limited and controlled by the constitution
Explanation: Correct answer: A. Constitutionalism is the principle that government power must be limited, organised and controlled by constitutional rules. It is not enough to possess a written constitution; actual governance must respect its limits, procedures and rights. Constitutionalism prevents rulers from treating personal preference as law and helps make public authority accountable. Option A is correct because it directly expresses limited government under constitutional control. Option B is wrong because constitutionalism opposes concentration of unlimited power in one person. Option C is wrong because constitutional government is subject to law, not above it. Option D is wrong because protection of citizens’ rights is an important part of constitutionalism. Memory cue: constitution is the rule framework; constitutionalism means rulers genuinely obey that framework.
24 Why is a constitution useful not only for the present generation but also for future generations?
0 reads0 helpful★ – (0)
Answer and explanation
Correct answer: B. Because it carries forward lasting values and institutional safeguards
Explanation: Correct answer: B. A constitution creates a durable framework for government, rights and public institutions. Future generations may change policies and amend some constitutional provisions through lawful procedures, but they inherit basic principles and safeguards that protect people from arbitrary power. This gives society continuity while still allowing peaceful change. Option A is wrong because constitutional protection is intended to preserve rights, not end them. Option B is correct because lasting values such as equality, liberty and lawful government, together with institutional safeguards, can guide later generations. Option C is wrong because each generation does not need to create a new country; it works within and develops the existing constitutional order. Option D is wrong because a constitution normally provides a framework for continuing elections. Memory cue: a constitution is a bridge between generations—it preserves core protections while allowing lawful change.
25 A constitution not only gives rights to citizens but also gives a basis to demand what kind of behaviour from the state?
0 reads0 helpful★ – (0)
Answer and explanation
Correct answer: D. Fair and rule-based behaviour
Explanation: Correct answer: D, fair and rule-based behaviour. A constitution is not merely a list of promises; it is a framework that limits government power and makes the state accountable. First, it declares important rights of citizens. Second, it lays down principles and procedures that public authorities must follow. Therefore, the government cannot treat people according to personal likes, dislikes, prejudice, or sudden orders. Its decisions should be based on law, applied fairly, and open to constitutional review. A is wrong because biased and secret action violates equal treatment and accountability. B is wrong because arbitrary punishment is not permitted merely because an authority wishes it. C is wrong because unequal and uncertain treatment makes rights insecure. D is correct because fairness and rule-based action protect citizens from misuse of power. Memory cue: rights become meaningful when the state is answerable to rules.
☆No ratings yetWrite a review / Rate this question
Was this question useful?
👍 0 Helpful ·👎 0 Not helpful
Difficulty
Easy0%
Medium0%
Hard0%
Was the explanation clear?
Yes 0%·No 0%
0 responses
Student Reviews
No published reviews yet.
Analytics choices
Google Analytics helps us understand site usage. Google may send limited cookie-free signals before your choice. The Live Visitors widget operates independently of this analytics choice; see the privacy policy for its provider and fallback details. Essential site features work without analytics cookies. You can change your choice later in Privacy choices. Privacy policy