If a person gives correct facts in a discussion but gets upset when asked for the source, which communication value is weak?
Answer and explanation
Correct answer: Transparency and acceptance of evidence
Asking for a source is a reasonable way to examine how a factual claim was obtained; it is not automatically an accusation. Becoming angry instead of explaining the source may show weak transparency and unwillingness to engage with evidence. A responsible communicator can state the source, acknowledge uncertainty, or correct the claim. Voice loudness, letter format, and image design are unrelated.
Frequently asked questions
What is the correct answer to this question?
Transparency and acceptance of evidence
Why is this the correct answer?
Asking for a source is a reasonable way to examine how a factual claim was obtained; it is not automatically an accusation. Becoming angry instead of explaining the source may show weak transparency and unwillingness to engage with evidence. A responsible communicator can state the source, acknowledge uncertainty, or correct the claim. Voice loudness, letter format, and image design are unrelated.
Which subject and chapter does this question cover?
This is a Class 9 Artificial Intelligence question. Chapter: Communication Skills-I. Topic: Perspectives in communication and barriers.
