A report reaches a correct conclusion, but the writer does not mention available facts that oppose the conclusion. Why would this be considered weak in an expert evaluation?
Answer and explanation
Correct answer: Because the report shows less neutrality and balanced presentation
A strong report presents relevant evidence fairly, including information that may complicate or challenge its conclusion. Omitting opposing facts can make the writer appear selective or biased, even when the final conclusion happens to be correct. A report may and should contain a conclusion; language simplicity and reading need are unrelated issues.
Frequently asked questions
What is the correct answer to this question?
Because the report shows less neutrality and balanced presentation
Why is this the correct answer?
A strong report presents relevant evidence fairly, including information that may complicate or challenge its conclusion. Omitting opposing facts can make the writer appear selective or biased, even when the final conclusion happens to be correct. A report may and should contain a conclusion; language simplicity and reading need are unrelated issues.
Which subject and chapter does this question cover?
This is a Class 9 Artificial Intelligence question. Chapter: Communication Skills-I. Topic: Perspectives in communication and barriers.
Student feedback
Was this question useful?
👍 0 Helpful 👎 0 Not helpful
Yes 0% No 0%
0 responsesStudent Reviews
No published reviews yet.
