Geography
Continental Drift Theory and its evidence
Practice questions
If a student calls Laurasia the southern landmass what is the correct correction?How should breakup of Pangaea be understood in the context of continental drift?Which option has an incorrect relation between evidence and explanation?Matching evidences on both margins of the Atlantic strengthen which idea?What was the relation between evidence and theory in Wegener's theory?Why can drawing direct conclusions from present positions be wrong in continental drift?Which statement correctly keeps the relation of Pangaea and Tethys?While comparing evidences in continental drift which pair shows evidences of most different nature?Which statement correctly states a limitation of paleoclimatic evidence?If a statement says plate tectonics made all Wegener's evidences wrong what is the correct response?In Wegener's theory was the centre of criticism the evidences or the mechanism?Which option correctly gives both old biological and old climatic clues?Which would be an overconfident wrong conclusion in Continental Drift Theory?Why can Wegener's concept be called a beginning of the idea of dynamic Earth?If a question gives coastline fit rock similarity and Mesosaurus together what is the best conclusion?Which statement correctly shows the historical importance of Wegener's theory?In the evidences of continental drift in which category should Pangaea best be placed?Which statement correctly relates evidence and modern explanation in continental drift?What would be the most mature conclusion about Continental Drift Theory?In the context of continental drift if a student calls Wegener completely wrong what is the most appropriate correction?