Update

Muft Shiksha™ एक 100% Free Education Portal है 🇮🇳, जिसका उद्देश्य Class 9–12 के हर विद्यार्थी तक High-Quality Education को पूरी तरह मुफ्त पहुँचाना है। 🇮🇳 हम मानते हैं कि अच्छी शिक्षा किसी student की आर्थिक स्थिति पर निर्भर नहीं होनी चाहिए। 🇮🇳 हर विद्यार्थी को वही Quality Study Material, MCQs, Quizzes, Exam Preparation, Concept-Based Learning और Bilingual Support मिलना चाहिए, जो आमतौर पर महंगी Coaching या Premium Platforms में मिलता है। Muft Shiksha™ 🇮🇳 इसी सोच के साथ बनाया गया है

Subjects
0 reads0 ratings0 helpful

Can a common citizen name a new organism scientifically on their own whim?

Answer and explanation

Correct answer: No; international code rules and formal publication are required

Answer: A. A scientific name is not made official merely because someone invents a suitable-sounding word. First, the organism must be studied carefully, its distinguishing characters must be described, and its identity must be established. The proposed name must then follow the relevant international code, such as the zoological or botanical code, and the description must be published in an accepted scientific form. These steps make names stable, traceable, and usable by scientists worldwide. A is correct because rules and valid publication are required. B is wrong: personal choice alone does not create a valid scientific name. C is wrong: being a doctor is not the qualification that determines taxonomic authorship. D is wrong: scientific naming is not reserved only for government officers; qualified taxonomists can propose names by following the code. The exact procedural details differ between organism groups, so the safe idea is regulated description, code compliance, and publication.

Related tags

Binomial NomenclatureScientific NamingTaxonomyRulesTaxonomy Binomial NomenclatureThe Living WorldBiology

Was this question useful?

No ratings yetWrite a review / Rate this question

Student Reviews

No published reviews yet.

Add Muft Shiksha to your Home Screen

In Safari, tap Share, then Add to Home Screen.