Why did the Non-Cooperation Movement get a different meaning in forest regions?
Answer and explanation
Correct answer: Because people there suffered from forest laws and restrictions on livelihood
The governing concept is that national movements acquired local meanings. In forest regions, colonial forest laws restricted grazing, collecting wood and forest produce, and sometimes cultivation, threatening customary livelihoods. People therefore connected non-cooperation with restoring local forest rights and resisting officials. Option A is correct. The other choices deny colonial control or reduce the movement to aims that were not central to forest communities.
Frequently asked questions
What is the correct answer to this question?
Because people there suffered from forest laws and restrictions on livelihood
Why is this the correct answer?
The governing concept is that national movements acquired local meanings. In forest regions, colonial forest laws restricted grazing, collecting wood and forest produce, and sometimes cultivation, threatening customary livelihoods. People therefore connected non-cooperation with restoring local forest rights and resisting officials. Option A is correct. The other choices deny colonial control or reduce the movement to aims that were not central to forest communities.
Which subject and chapter does this question cover?
This is a Class 10 Social Science question. Chapter: Chapter 2: Nationalism in India. Topic: Differing Strands within the Movement.
क्या यह प्रश्न उपयोगी था?
👍 Helpful: 0 👎 Not helpful: 0
क्या explanation समझ आया?
Yes 0% · No 0% (0 responses)
Write a review / Rate this question
Student Reviews
अभी कोई प्रकाशित review नहीं है।
⚠ Report an issue
