Muft Shiksha™ एक 100% Free Education Portal है 🇮🇳, जिसका उद्देश्य Class 9–12 के हर विद्यार्थी तक High-Quality Education को पूरी तरह मुफ्त पहुँचाना है। 🇮🇳 हम मानते हैं कि अच्छी शिक्षा किसी student की आर्थिक स्थिति पर निर्भर नहीं होनी चाहिए। 🇮🇳 हर विद्यार्थी को वही Quality Study Material, MCQs, Quizzes, Exam Preparation, Concept-Based Learning और Bilingual Support मिलना चाहिए, जो आमतौर पर महंगी Coaching या Premium Platforms में मिलता है। Muft Shiksha™ 🇮🇳 इसी सोच के साथ बनाया गया है
In Class 10 General Knowledge, under the Indian History chapter, this topic introduces the Indian Freedom Movement and its role in ending British colonial rule. Students learn about the growth of national consciousness, major phases of the struggle, important leaders, public participation, and the significance of independence in shaping modern India.
TOPIC PRACTICE
Quiz this set
Up to 25 questions from this page. Select your focus, then start.
25 questions
Choose questions
Hard · Level 4View options
Required participation of princely states was not obtained
Congress did not exist
India was already independent
Simon Commission refused
Hard · Level 4View options
Congress gained practical experience of governance
India became independent immediately
Simon Commission was formed
Salt Tax ended
Hard · Level 4View options
Opposition to involving India in war without consent
Welcome to British rule
Support for Simon Commission
Acceptance of Salt Tax
Hard · Level 4View options
It had no immediate national government and transfer of power
It gave complete independence
It abolished all taxes
It enforced Constitution
Hard · Level 4View options
It seemed to threaten Indian unity
It reduced Salt Tax
It gave Congress permanent power
It brought back Simon Commission
Hard · Level 4View options
Local people took spontaneous action
British government led the movement
Congress withdrew the movement
Muslim League ended the movement
Hard · Level 4View options
Challenge to British authority at local level
Support for British rule
Welcome of Simon Commission
Division of princely states
Hard · Level 4View options
It increased nationalist confidence among Indian soldiers and people
It made British rule permanent
It ended Congress
It started Swadeshi Movement
Hard · Level 4View options
National unity could rise above communal identity
British rule was strongest
There was no discontent in India
Simon Commission was successful
Hard · Level 4View options
It showed crisis of loyalty even in colonial armed forces
It increased British trade
It started Sati
It partitioned Bengal
Hard · Level 4View options
Balance between Congress unity and League autonomy concerns
Compromise between Sati and widow remarriage
Compromise between British army and Kisan Sabha
Compromise between Salt Tax and rail tax
Hard · Level 4View options
Congress and League interpreted compulsory grouping differently
It had Salt Law
It had Sati
It had Simon Commission
Hard · Level 4View options
Toward communal polarisation and partition
Toward complete Swadeshi production
Toward return of Simon Commission
Toward independence of princely states
Hard · Level 4View options
Boundary was announced late and large-scale displacement occurred
It imposed Salt Tax
It founded Congress
It started Swadeshi Movement
Hard · Level 4View options
British paramountcy ended
Company rule over states increased
All states were given to France
All states automatically went to Pakistan
Hard · Level 4View options
Ability of Indians to frame constitutional structure of their own rule
Permanent acceptance of British rule
Expansion of Salt Law
Success of Simon Commission
Hard · Level 4View options
It gave direction to basic ideals of independent India
It created British army
It partitioned Bengal
It sent Simon Commission
Hard · Level 4View options
Use of diplomacy, firmness and legal documents
Use of only foreign army
Leaving all princely states independent
Giving decision to Simon Commission
Hard · Level 4View options
The Nizam wanted independence and the state was located inside India
It was a French colony
It was already in Pakistan
It was the British capital
Hard · Level 4View options
It organised Indians abroad against British rule
It sent Simon Commission
It integrated princely states
It made Salt Law
Hard · Level 4View options
To change British education policy
To obtain funds for revolutionary activities
To make Poona Pact
To form Cabinet Mission
Hard · Level 4View options
Challenging colonial arms and communication system
Petitioning the British Parliament
Leaving princely states independent
Strengthening the Salt Law
Hard · Level 4View options
Only naval revolt
Only constitutional petition
Regional strength of non-violent mass organisation
Only princely military power
Hard · Level 4View options
They organised people of princely states for political rights
They welcomed Simon Commission
They imposed Salt Tax
They expanded British army
Hard · Level 4View options
It was linked with the demand of crop share by sharecroppers
It was protest against Rowlatt Act
It was an INA trial
It was Cabinet Mission Plan
Question 1HardLevel 4
Why could the federal scheme of the Government of India Act 1935 not be implemented?
Correct answer: A
The direct answer is A: the required participation of the princely states was not obtained. The Act of 1935 proposed an all-India federation made from British Indian provinces and princely states. The federation could begin only if enough rulers joined voluntarily. The rulers did not provide the necessary accession, so the federal part remained only a proposal and was never implemented. Option A is correct because it identifies this missing condition. Option B is wrong because the Congress already existed and was politically active. Option C is wrong because India was still under British rule. Option D is wrong because the Simon Commission did not stop this plan; it came earlier and had a different purpose. Remember: proposed federation plus missing princely-state consent equals no federation.
What psychological effect did the Indian National Army create in the freedom movement?
Correct answer: A
The Indian National Army, or INA, created a strong psychological effect by showing that Indians could organize an armed struggle against British rule. Its activities under Subhas Chandra Bose encouraged people to think of freedom as an achievable national goal, not merely a distant wish. This increased confidence among Indian soldiers and ordinary citizens.
The INA did not permanently strengthen British rule, end the Congress, or begin the Swadeshi Movement, which had started earlier. Its greatest effect was symbolic and emotional: it inspired courage, unity, and nationalist feeling. Therefore, option A correctly describes the psychological impact of the INA on the freedom movement.
Why was the Royal Indian Navy revolt 1946 a serious signal for British rule?
Correct answer: A
Direct answer: Option A is correct. The Royal Indian Navy revolt of 1946 was serious because it showed that dissatisfaction and disobedience had entered an important part of the colonial armed forces. A navy is supposed to obey the ruling government, so a revolt by its sailors could make the British question whether Indian soldiers and sailors would continue to support British rule. The revolt was connected with complaints about poor treatment, discrimination, and wider nationalist feeling. It did not by itself end British rule, but it was a warning that controlling India by force was becoming unreliable. Option A is correct because it describes this crisis of loyalty. Option B is wrong: the revolt did not increase British trade; it created political and administrative difficulty. Option C is wrong: Sati was an older social practice and was not started by this event. Option D is wrong: the Partition of Bengal occurred in 1905, not because of the 1946 naval revolt. Memory cue: a revolt inside colonial forces means the rulers can no longer fully trust the force that protects their rule.
What caused dispute over the grouping scheme of Cabinet Mission Plan?
Correct answer: A
The direct answer is A: “Congress and League interpreted compulsory grouping differently.” The Cabinet Mission Plan of 1946 proposed a united India with provinces arranged in groups. The grouping question became controversial because the Congress and the Muslim League did not understand the nature and force of grouping in the same way. The League wanted grouping to be meaningful and effectively compulsory, while Congress resisted an interpretation that would restrict the freedom of provinces and weaken the unity of the future constitution. This disagreement made implementation difficult and weakened the plan. Option A is correct because it identifies the central constitutional dispute. Option B is wrong because the Salt Law belonged to the Civil Disobedience movement and was not the cause of this 1946 disagreement. Option C is wrong because sati was a social practice and was unrelated to the Cabinet Mission’s grouping proposal. Option D is wrong because the Simon Commission was a separate commission appointed in 1927. Memory cue: Cabinet Mission grouping means a disagreement over whether provincial groups were compulsory and how much freedom provinces had.
Why was Hyderabad a difficult case in integration of princely states?
Correct answer: A
Direct answer: Option A is correct. Hyderabad was a large princely state located inside the geographical area of India. Its ruler, the Nizam, wanted to remain independent rather than immediately join India. This created a difficult political and security problem: an independent state in the middle of India could obstruct territorial unity and create administrative complications. The chain is: Hyderabad was surrounded by Indian territory; the Nizam resisted accession; therefore integration could not be completed smoothly. Option A contains both essential facts. Option B is wrong because Hyderabad was not a French colony. Option C is wrong because it was not already part of Pakistan. Option D is wrong because British India’s capital was not Hyderabad; the British capital moved from Calcutta to New Delhi in 1911. The later Indian action is commonly remembered as Operation Polo, but the option is correct because of the Nizam’s position and Hyderabad’s location.
Google Analytics helps us understand site usage. Google may send limited cookie-free signals before your choice. The Live Visitors widget operates independently of this analytics choice; see the privacy policy for its provider and fallback details. Essential site features work without analytics cookies. You can change your choice later in Privacy choices. Privacy policy