Why would it be wrong to call the Constitution of 1791 a fully democratic constitution?

Correct answer: Because property and tax based limits on suffrage remained

The direct answer is A: property and tax-based limits on voting remained. The Constitution of 1791 limited the king and created a constitutional monarchy, which was an important change, but it was not full democracy. Citizens were divided into active and passive citizens. Active male citizens who met property or tax requirements could vote; poorer men could not vote, and women were excluded from political voting. Therefore, political rights were not equal for everyone. A is correct because it identifies the main limitation. B is wrong because the Constitution accepted the importance of the Declaration of the Rights of Man and Citizen. C is wrong because the king was no longer an absolute ruler; his powers were limited by the constitution. D is wrong because the National Convention was created later, in 1792, after the monarchy was suspended. The exam lesson is to mention both progress and limitation: constitutional government increased rights, but suffrage remained restricted.