Update

Muft Shiksha™ एक 100% Free Education Portal है 🇮🇳, जिसका उद्देश्य Class 9–12 के हर विद्यार्थी तक High-Quality Education को पूरी तरह मुफ्त पहुँचाना है। 🇮🇳 हम मानते हैं कि अच्छी शिक्षा किसी student की आर्थिक स्थिति पर निर्भर नहीं होनी चाहिए। 🇮🇳 हर विद्यार्थी को वही Quality Study Material, MCQs, Quizzes, Exam Preparation, Concept-Based Learning और Bilingual Support मिलना चाहिए, जो आमतौर पर महंगी Coaching या Premium Platforms में मिलता है। Muft Shiksha™ 🇮🇳 इसी सोच के साथ बनाया गया है

Subjects
0 reads0 ratings0 helpful

Why would it be wrong to call De Launay's killing only personal violence?

Advertisement

Answer and explanation

Correct answer: Because he was governor of Bastille and became a symbol of public anger

De Launay was the governor of the Bastille, the royal fortress-prison in Paris. The Bastille represented the authority of the monarchy and was widely associated with arbitrary royal power. When the Paris crowd attacked the fortress on 14 July 1789, anger was directed not only at one individual but also at the political system and symbols he represented. De Launay's killing must therefore be understood within a larger popular uprising against royal authority, shortages and injustice, rather than as an isolated personal quarrel.

Option D is correct because it identifies both his official position and his symbolic importance. Option A falsely describes him as a singer, while option B wrongly places him among the peasants of the Third Estate. Option C gives him an invented connection with the National Assembly. The educational point is to connect a person with the institution he represented: De Launay stood for the Bastille and, in the eyes of the crowd, for oppressive royal power.

Related tags

De LaunayBastillePublic Anger

Frequently asked questions

What is the correct answer to this question?

Because he was governor of Bastille and became a symbol of public anger

Why is this the correct answer?

De Launay was the governor of the Bastille, the royal fortress-prison in Paris. The Bastille represented the authority of the monarchy and was widely associated with arbitrary royal power. When the Paris crowd attacked the fortress on 14 July 1789, anger was directed not only at one individual but also at the political system and symbols he represented. De Launay's killing must therefore be understood within a larger popular uprising against royal authority, shortages and injustice, rather than as an isolated personal quarrel.

Option D is correct because it identifies both his official position and his symbolic importance. Option A falsely describes him as a singer, while option B wrongly places him among the peasants of the Third Estate. Option C gives him an invented connection with the National Assembly. The educational point is to connect a person with the institution he represented: De Launay stood for the Bastille and, in the eyes of the crowd, for oppressive royal power.

Which subject and chapter does this question cover?

This is a Class 9 History question. Chapter: The French Revolution. Topic: The Outbreak of the Revolution.

Was this question useful?

No ratings yetWrite a review / Rate this question

Student Reviews

No published reviews yet.

Advertisement

Add Muft Shiksha to your Home Screen

In Safari, tap Share, then Add to Home Screen.