Why should the imprisonment of the king and family be seen not merely as security action but as a crisis of royal legitimacy?
Answer and explanation
Correct answer: Because it showed that people no longer trusted royal authority
The imprisonment of Louis XVI and his family had a meaning far beyond physical protection. A king traditionally represented the state and claimed authority through the institution of monarchy. When the royal family was detained, revolutionary citizens and political bodies were showing that the king could no longer be trusted to defend the nation or uphold the new order. The event therefore revealed a crisis of royal legitimacy: the monarchy still existed as an institution, but its moral and political authority had been seriously damaged. Option B states this meaning correctly.
The reasoning depends on distinguishing a security measure from a political judgment. If the royal family had merely been guarded, the action would not necessarily question kingship. Their imprisonment followed suspicion of royal disloyalty and made the people and revolutionary institutions the main guardians of national sovereignty. Options A, C and D introduce claims unrelated to this crisis. Thus option B best explains why the event signalled that royal authority was no longer considered trustworthy.
Frequently asked questions
What is the correct answer to this question?
Because it showed that people no longer trusted royal authority
Why is this the correct answer?
The imprisonment of Louis XVI and his family had a meaning far beyond physical protection. A king traditionally represented the state and claimed authority through the institution of monarchy. When the royal family was detained, revolutionary citizens and political bodies were showing that the king could no longer be trusted to defend the nation or uphold the new order. The event therefore revealed a crisis of royal legitimacy: the monarchy still existed as an institution, but its moral and political authority had been seriously damaged. Option B states this meaning correctly.
The reasoning depends on distinguishing a security measure from a political judgment. If the royal family had merely been guarded, the action would not necessarily question kingship. Their imprisonment followed suspicion of royal disloyalty and made the people and revolutionary institutions the main guardians of national sovereignty. Options A, C and D introduce claims unrelated to this crisis. Thus option B best explains why the event signalled that royal authority was no longer considered trustworthy.
Which subject and chapter does this question cover?
This is a Class 9 History question. Chapter: The French Revolution. Topic: France Abolishes Monarchy and Becomes a Republic.
Student feedback
Was this question useful?
👍 0 Helpful 👎 0 Not helpful
Yes 0% No 0%
0 responsesStudent Reviews
No published reviews yet.
