Update

Muft Shiksha™ एक 100% Free Education Portal है 🇮🇳, जिसका उद्देश्य Class 9–12 के हर विद्यार्थी तक High-Quality Education को पूरी तरह मुफ्त पहुँचाना है। 🇮🇳 हम मानते हैं कि अच्छी शिक्षा किसी student की आर्थिक स्थिति पर निर्भर नहीं होनी चाहिए। 🇮🇳 हर विद्यार्थी को वही Quality Study Material, MCQs, Quizzes, Exam Preparation, Concept-Based Learning और Bilingual Support मिलना चाहिए, जो आमतौर पर महंगी Coaching या Premium Platforms में मिलता है। Muft Shiksha™ 🇮🇳 इसी सोच के साथ बनाया गया है

Subjects
0 reads0 ratings0 helpful

Why can the Enabling Act be called the end of democracy from within democracy?

Advertisement

Answer and explanation

Correct answer: Because parliamentary power was nearly ended through a legal process

The Enabling Act of March 1933 illustrates how a democratic legal procedure can be used to destroy democracy. It gave Hitler’s cabinet the power to make laws without the approval of the Reichstag, even when those laws differed from the constitution. The act was passed in parliament, but intimidation, the arrest of opponents, and the exclusion of many Communist deputies made genuine debate impossible. Once parliamentary control disappeared, Hitler could suppress civil liberties, ban opposition parties, and establish dictatorship through apparently legal measures. Therefore, option C is correct: democratic institutions were used to remove their own authority. Option A is opposite, while B and D do not describe the act’s effect.

Related tags

Enabling ActLegal DictatorshipParliamentary DemocracyHitler’s Rise To PowerHitler S Rise To PowerNazism And The Rise Of HitlerHistoryClass 9 Mcq

Frequently asked questions

What is the correct answer to this question?

Because parliamentary power was nearly ended through a legal process

Why is this the correct answer?

The Enabling Act of March 1933 illustrates how a democratic legal procedure can be used to destroy democracy. It gave Hitler’s cabinet the power to make laws without the approval of the Reichstag, even when those laws differed from the constitution. The act was passed in parliament, but intimidation, the arrest of opponents, and the exclusion of many Communist deputies made genuine debate impossible. Once parliamentary control disappeared, Hitler could suppress civil liberties, ban opposition parties, and establish dictatorship through apparently legal measures. Therefore, option C is correct: democratic institutions were used to remove their own authority. Option A is opposite, while B and D do not describe the act’s effect.

Which subject and chapter does this question cover?

This is a Class 9 History question. Chapter: Nazism and the Rise of Hitler. Topic: Hitler’s Rise to Power.

Was this question useful?

No ratings yetWrite a review / Rate this question

Student Reviews

No published reviews yet.

Advertisement