Update

Muft Shiksha™ एक 100% Free Education Portal है 🇮🇳, जिसका उद्देश्य Class 9–12 के हर विद्यार्थी तक High-Quality Education को पूरी तरह मुफ्त पहुँचाना है। 🇮🇳 हम मानते हैं कि अच्छी शिक्षा किसी student की आर्थिक स्थिति पर निर्भर नहीं होनी चाहिए। 🇮🇳 हर विद्यार्थी को वही Quality Study Material, MCQs, Quizzes, Exam Preparation, Concept-Based Learning और Bilingual Support मिलना चाहिए, जो आमतौर पर महंगी Coaching या Premium Platforms में मिलता है। Muft Shiksha™ 🇮🇳 इसी सोच के साथ बनाया गया है

Subjects
0 reads0 ratings0 helpful

Which statement gives the best comparative analysis of the Tennis Court Oath and storming of Bastille?

Advertisement

Answer and explanation

Correct answer: The first was constitutional resolve of deputies and the second direct challenge by people

The Tennis Court Oath and the storming of the Bastille were both revolutionary challenges to royal authority, but they were different kinds of action. On 20 June 1789, deputies of the Third Estate and their allies took the Tennis Court Oath, promising not to separate until France had a constitution. This was an organised political and constitutional act. On 14 July 1789, people of Paris stormed the Bastille, making it a direct popular attack on a symbol of royal power. Together, the events show institutional and popular forms of resistance.

Option A is correct because it makes this distinction accurately. Option B treats serious political events as sports, which is absurd. Option C reverses the two events: the Tennis Court Oath was not a prison attack, and the Bastille was not an assembly oath. Option D gives the wrong year; both occurred in 1789, not 1793. The comparison is strongest when it explains both the shared challenge and the different participants and methods.

Related tags

French RevolutionTennis CourtBastille Comparison

Frequently asked questions

What is the correct answer to this question?

The first was constitutional resolve of deputies and the second direct challenge by people

Why is this the correct answer?

The Tennis Court Oath and the storming of the Bastille were both revolutionary challenges to royal authority, but they were different kinds of action. On 20 June 1789, deputies of the Third Estate and their allies took the Tennis Court Oath, promising not to separate until France had a constitution. This was an organised political and constitutional act. On 14 July 1789, people of Paris stormed the Bastille, making it a direct popular attack on a symbol of royal power. Together, the events show institutional and popular forms of resistance.

Option A is correct because it makes this distinction accurately. Option B treats serious political events as sports, which is absurd. Option C reverses the two events: the Tennis Court Oath was not a prison attack, and the Bastille was not an assembly oath. Option D gives the wrong year; both occurred in 1789, not 1793. The comparison is strongest when it explains both the shared challenge and the different participants and methods.

Which subject and chapter does this question cover?

This is a Class 9 History question. Chapter: The French Revolution. Topic: The Outbreak of the Revolution.

Was this question useful?

No ratings yetWrite a review / Rate this question

Student Reviews

No published reviews yet.

Advertisement

Add Muft Shiksha to your Home Screen

In Safari, tap Share, then Add to Home Screen.